c
0
P Docket No. C1-993.12
Y Award No. 9
SPECIAL WARD OF ADJUSTMENT N0. 172
BROTHERHOOD OF RAID.-TAY AND STEAMSHIP CLERKS,
FREIGHT HANDLERS, EXPRESS AND STATION EMPLOYES
versus
THE CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY OF NOW JERSEY
STATI2,iENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that,
1 - Carrier violates the provisions of Rule 22(b) - REST DAYS
AND HOLIDAYS - by refusing to comply with the provisions of
said rule,
and
2 - Carrier shall be required to properly compensate all
affected Employes subsequent to May Ist, 1954.
FINDINGS
Insofar as the claim for holiday pay under Article II, Section 1
of the Agreement of August 21, 1954, it must be denied on the authority of
Award Nos. 7433, 7434, 7479 and 7722 of the Third Division, National Railroad
Adjustment Board.
Insofar as the claim relates to payment for work performed on
holidays, it must be sustained under the provisions of Rule 22(b). It is
noted that Section
5
of Article II of the Agreement of August 21, 1954
expressly provides that such rule shall not be construed to change existing
rules and practices thereunder governing the payment for work performed on
a holiday. Accordingly, 22(b) is not affected by that Agreement and remains
in full force and effect.
A74ARD
Claim of violation relative to pay for holidays is denied.
Claim of violation relative to pay for work performed on holidays
is sustained.
SPECIAL WARD OF ADJUSTMENT N0. 172
/s, Dudley E. Whiting
Dudley E. Whiting - Chairman
/s/ Tahn.
A. Palmatier
Iq/
J. J. Duffy
W.A. Palmatier Employe Member J. J. D ' -Carrier Member
Jersey City, N. J.
March 20, 1957