ORG. FILE 16-29 ANARD N0. 5
CARRIER FILE 140-465-31 CASE N0. 5
NRAB FILE CL-7991
SPECIAL BOARD OF ADJUSTh-ENT N0. 174
PARTIES The Brotherhood of Railway and Steamship Clerks,
Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employes
TO
DISPUTE The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe. Railway Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood
that:
(a) Carrier violated the rules of the current Clerks' Agreement when
on or about March 15, 1953 and February 15, 1954, without conference or agreement
with the Brotherhood, it discontinued several clerical positions at Hanford,
California, and assigned the duties of these positions to the occupants of Telegrapher positions, who hold no seniority rights under the Clerks' Agreement; and,
(b) Claim that all such work be restored to employes covered by the
rules of the current Clerks' Agreement; and,
(c) Claim that Mr, E, Ender be compensated for 7 hours per day at
punitive rate of his regular assignment, retroactive to March
15,
1953 and continuing until such violation of Agreement rules is corrected; and,
(d) Mr. P. Cook shall be compensated for 7 hours per day at punitive
rate of his regular assignment, retroactive to March 15, 1953, and continuing
until such violation of agreement rules is corrected.
FINDINGS: Special Board of Adjustment No, 174, upon the whole record and all
the evidence, finds and holds:
The Carrier and Employes involved in this dispute are respectively
Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as amended.
This Special Board of Adjustment has jurisdiction over this dispute,
From 192$ to 1944 the Carriers station forces at Hanford consisted
of
Agent 9 AM
- 6
FM
Telegrapher-Cashier 8 AM - 4 PM
Telegrapher-Clerk 4 FYI - 12 MN
Telegrapher-Clerk 12 MN - 8 AM
Cashier Clerk
8
AM - 5 PM
General Clerk 11 AM - 8 PM
General Clerk 9 AM - 6 Iii
Trucker 7 AM - 4
HNi
Trucker 4 FM - 12 MN
AWARD No.
5
CASE NO.
5
There were also at Hanford Tower, about one or two blocks from the station, three
Tnwermen who operated control levers exclusively,
In
1944
complete communications facilities were installed at Hanford '
Tower whereupon the three telegrapher positions at Hanford Station were abolished,
the three towermen positions at Hanford Tower were reclassified to telegraphertowermen and all communications and train order work was performed at the tower
in addition to the handling of levers. So the telegrapher force remained unchanged
until November
25, 1952
when the installation of Centralized Traffic Control
eliminated the Hanford Tower and communication facilities were reinstalled at
Hanford Station.
The three Telegrapher -Towermen positions were thereupon abolished and
the Agent position was reclassified to Agent-Telegrapher upon the supposition that
all communications work could be performed on the first trick. This supposition
proved unfounded and effective January 1,
1953
the two General Clerk positions
were abolished and the two Telegrapher-Clerk positions were reassigned.
On January 1,
1953
the Hanford station force consisted of:
Agent-Telegrapher
9
AM
- 5
FM
Telegrapher-Clerk 3 FM - 11 Piq
Telegrapher-Clerk
9
PM
- 5
AM
Cashier Clerk
8
AM
- 5
FM
Ticket Information Clerk
6:15
AM
- 3:15 PV
Baggageman
5
AM - 2 PNi
Baggageman 3 R4 - 12 MN
It is to be observed that the telegrapher force was not assigned around-the-clock:
there was an overlap
3 PM - 5
PM and
9 Fro - 11
FM and a void
5
AM - 9 AM.
On February 21,
1954
one Baggageman position was abolished and the
assigned hours of the Ticket Info Clerk and one of the Telegrapher-Clerks were
changed-
Agent-Telegrapher 9 AM
- 5
Fm
Telegrapher-Clerk
3 FM - 11 Ffi4
Telegrapher-Clerk
5
AM - 1 a1
Cashier-Clerk
8
Am
- 5
FM
Ticket-Info. Clerk 3 P1'1 - 12 MN
Baggageman 3 FM - 12 MN
This left the telegrapher force still not assigned around-the-clock: there was
an overlap
3 FM - 5
PM and
9
AM - 1
FN
and a void 11
FM - 5
AM.
These two overlaps continued until October 26,
1956
when the situation
was corrected.
First. Clerical work at this station has been traditionally and customarily
performed by both crafts; and neither Clerks nor Telegraphers has an exclusive
right to the work,
i i
AWARD N0. 5
CASE NO. 5
Communications work was not transferred back and forth between the
Station and the Tower for the purpose of transferring work from one craft to the
other, On the contrary., the communication facilities themselves were physically
transferred from one location to the other and the work simply followed the facilities. We know of no limitation upon a carriers right to relocate and transfer
communication facilities as the Carrier did here,
When the communication facilities were located at the Station$ on well
settled principles telegraphers filled out their time with clerical work; and when
the communication facilities were transferred to the Tower, telegraphers followed
their work and took no clerical work with them.
When the communication facilities were re-transferred to the Station,
the telegraphers again followed their work and the right to perform clerical
work flowed back to them,
Second, The right of telegraphers to perform clerical work is not an absolute
right. It is conditioned upon the existence of the telegraphic duties and also
upon spare time during which the telegrapher may be assigned clerical duties
to fill out his time (Award 615). For example, if there were eight hours of
telegraphic work and eight hours of clerical work on a given trick, it would be a
palpable invasion of Clerks' rights to assign two Telegrapher-Clerks to that trick.
It is possible that the services of two telegraphers might be required
during a given trick, but there is no showing here that the services of two
telegraphers were required during the overlaps disclosed by this record.
Such being the case Clerks' rights were invaded during the overlaps
when two telegraphers were on duty. It follows that a sustaining award is in
order to the extent of the overlaps which can be satisfied by payments for a
minimum call for each overlap,
AWARD
Item (a) of the claim sustained.
Item (b) of the claim denied.
Item (c) and Item (d) of the claim each sustained for the period March
15, 1953 to October 26., 1956 to the extent of one minimum call each day.
/s/ Hubert Wyckoff
Chairman
/s/ A. D. Stafford /s/ J. D. Bearden
Carrier Member Employe Member
Dated at Chicago., Illinois December 16~ 1958