A
10
ORG. FILE 21-142 AWARD N0.
CARRIER. FILE 111.0-529-27 CASE N0. $
NRAB FILE CL-812$
SPECIAL BOARD OF ADJUSTI9ENT N0. 174
PARTIES The Brotherhood of Railway and Steamship Clerks,
Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employes
TO
DISFUTE The Gulf, Colorado and Santa Fe Railway Company
STATEHIENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
(a) Carrier violates the current Clerks' Agreement when it requires
Samson James, Janitor-Porter, Paula Valley, Oklahoma, to vacate his regular assigned
position on his assigned rest days and requires or permits a Class 1 employe to
perform the work thereon; and
(b) Samson James shall now be paid eight (8) hours at time and one-half
at rate of his regular position for each Saturday and Sunday from September 11, 1954
forward until violation is corrected.
FIND17dGS: Special Board of Adjustment No. 174, upon the whole record and all the
evidence, finds and holds:
The Carrier and Employes involved in this dispute are respectively
Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as amended.
This Special Board of Adjustment has jurisdiction over this dispute.
When the 40-hour week became effective September 1 1949 this Class 3
Janitor Position was treated, as it had been before, as a 7-day position; and while
for a time the position was relieved by a regular assigned swing relief employe or
by an off-in-force-reduction employe, Claimant who was the regular occupant of the
position had, for some time prior to September 11 1954, worked both of his rest days
for which he was compensated at the rate of time and one-half, since this position
was the only Class 3 position at Paula Valley in 7-day service.
Prior to July 17 1954 four passenger trains arrived and departed Paula
Valley during the assigned hours ( 11 AM to 8 FM) of the Janitor position and a
Class 1 General Clerk position. The exchange of mail at Paula Valley was rather
heavy and required the service of at least two employes in order to avoid delay to
trains. Accordingly both the General Clerk and the Janitor regularly handled the
baggage and mail on these four trains.
On July 17 1954 two of these trains were discontinued whereupon the
Carrier reduced the Janitor position from a 7-day position to a 5-day position with
rest days on Saturdays and Sundays.
Since July 17 1954 the assigned duties of the Janitor position (with
average time consumed according to the Carrier's check) have been:
Item 1 Clean station (2 waiting rooms 1 office, 2 toilets) 2POOyt
Item 2 Handle. baggage and mail (2 trains) 1900.7
Item 3 Maintain fire in 3 coal stoves (fall and winter only) 290012
Item 4 Maintain Company station park (spring and summer only) 3?00"
Award No. $
Case No. 8
Since September 11 1954 Item 1 and Item 4 have been discontinued on
Saturdays and Sundays. Item 3 has been performed on Saturdays and Sundays by the
clerical employes on duty in the same manner in which it has always been handled
outside the assigned hours of the Janitor. The General Clerk alone handled the
baggage and mail on the remaining two trains on the Janitor's rest days.
The parties are in disagreement on the essential question whether the
work in question was part of the regular assignment of the Janitor or of the
General Clerk. The Organization contends that the General Clerk has always assisted the Janitor and the Carrier contends that the Janitor has always assisted the
General Clerk.
It is established by the evidence of record that since 1944 the handling
of mail and baggage has been part of the regular assignment of both positions and
that the work has never been exclusively assigned to either position. Article III
Section 8 (e) forbids the bulletining of Class 3 positions but there is no doubt
that the Janitor has regularly performed this work. There is before us a bulletin
of the General Clerk Position posted March 20 1954 which lists 4working mail and
baggage on trains 16, 5, 305 and 306,1 among the duties of the position; and there -
is no doubt that the General Clerk has also regularly performed this work.
First. The Organization's argument that the Agreement forbids the assignment of
this work to a Class 1 employe in the circumstances presented by this claim cannot
be sustained. Article II Section 1 contemplates the performance of non-clerical
work by Class 1 employes; and Article II Section 3 fortifies this conclusion
(Awards 6140 and 2011; and see Award 7167).
Second. The Janitor position had no exclusive right to handle mail and baggage on
Saturdays and Sundays; and the Carrier was at liberty to discontinue station clean
ing on Saturdays and Sundays. It follows that the Carrier was entitled to treat the
Janitor position as a 5-day position within the meaning of Article VI Section 10(b)
when the handling of baggage and mail no longer required the service of two
employes (Awards 7133 and 7371).
A ?1 A R D
Claim denied.
/sl Hubert 1lvckoff
Chairman
Is/
A. D. Stafford /s/ J. D. Bearden
Carrier Member Empioye Member
Dated at Chicago, nlinois December 16 1958
-2-