SPECIAL BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT N0.
192 ~l,
PARTIES: BROTHERHOOD OF RAITJUAY AND STEAMSHIP CLERKS
v
0
r Q
FREIGHT HANDLERS,, EXPRESS AND STATION EMPLOY.,<;~
THE BALTIMORE ~ OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY ~~A? TA
AWARD IN DOCKET N0.
24
STATEMENT Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
OF CLAIM:
(a) Carrier violated the Agreement between Participating
Eastern Western and Southeastern Carriers and Employes
represented by the Fifteen Cooperating Railway Labor
organizations signatory thereto$ signed at Chicago, Illinoisp
on August 21,,
1954$
when it failed to comply with the pro
visions of Article V$ Section l(a) of said Agreement., in that
claim was not denied within the 60 day period provided therein
and
(b) That Mrs. Evelyn Pitzer now be paid at the pro rata rate
for December 30 and 31,
1954,
account furloughed employe being
used to fill position
68-2-117.,
such furloughed employe not
having properly registered in accordance with the provisions
of Article Up Section 2j of the August 21,
1954
Agreement,
FINDINGS:
A short time prior to January 13)
1955
the claimant filed a time slip
claiming time because of not being permitted to work a certain position on
December 30 and 319
1954e
The claim was declined by the Regional Accountant on
January
13$ 1955
and again on February 1$
1955.
On February
8. 1955
the claimant
notified the Regional Accountant that she wished to withdraw the claim. On
February 11,
1955
the Division Chairman filed a claim in favor of the claimant
for December 30 and
31, 1954
asserting a different theory in support thereof.
Thereafter several exchanges of correspondence passed between the Regional
Accountant and the Division Chairman in which the Regional Accountant explained
the action which had taken place with respect to the first time slip filed by
claimant. We are not informed of the dates nor of the exact contents of that
correspondence., but apparently there was no express denial of the claim filed
February 11,
1955
contained therein.
The employees argue that this claim should now be allowed since it was
not denied within the sixty day limit provided for in the August
21., 1954
Agreement. (Time limit rule,)
The Carrier contends that the claim should be denied on the basis that
the claim originally filed was not appealed to the Superintendent within 60 days,
It is apparent that the claim filed by claimant and that filed by the
Division Chairman involved the same occurrence and that there was no
difference
between the time claimed in either case.
Article V Section 1(a) of the August
21, 1954
agreement requires that if
any claim is disallowed vrithin 60 days from the date same is filed., the Carrier
shall notify whoever filed the claim or grievance (the employee or his representative) in writing of the reason for such disallowance. The Carrier's Regional
Docket No.
24
Accountant complied with that provision of the Agreement. If appeal was to be
taken it was then incumbent upon the employee or her representative to appeal
that decision to the Superintendent within 60 days from notice of disallowance
not to withdraw and then file a new claim covering the same occurrence and asking
for the same relief. Obviously, the Agreement of August 21, 1954 did not intend
that claims identical in nature could be filed, withdrawn at will and re-filed.
This would lead to chaos and place an undue burden on the Carrier where it could
find itself in the position of having to decline the same claim over and over
again or face the penalty of allowance. The mere fact that the Division Chairman
asserted a different theory in support of the claim does not alter the fact that
it was the same claim; He would have been free to argue that same theory on
appeal. It is well known that General Chairmen very frequently and properly seek
to support claims on final handling on a different basis than had been argued in
the earlier steps of the grievance procedure.
We find that this claim is barred by reason of the time limitation rule,
AWARD
The claim is not payable because of being barred under the time limita-
tion rule.
/s/ Francis J. Robertson
Francis J. Robertson
Chairman
E.
J, Ho fman
Employee Member
/s/ T. S. Woods
T, S. Woods
Carrier Member
Dated at Baltimore., Maryland this 17th day of February, 1959.