SPECIAL BOA1ttD OF ADJUS73~,I;NT NO. 192
PARTIES: BROTHERHGOD CF SAILTWAY AND STEAMSHIP CLERKS
FREIGHT HANDLERS, EXPRESS AND STATIGN a1PLO YES
and
THE BALTIMO..cE AND OHIO RAILhDAD COMPANY
AWARD IN DOCKET NO.
41.
STATEMENT Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that Anthony
OF CLAIM: Damiano, Stowman, Pier 21, North P,iver, New York, N. Y,, who
was dismissed from service on April
13, 1956,
be returned to
service and compensated for all time lost, less
earnings made
in other employment during time out of service.
FINDINGS:
After investigation the claimant was dismissed on charges of gambling
on B&0 property and of roughing up a Patrolman (Special Officer) while in the
performance of the latterts duty.
The employes contend that this disciplinary action should be set aside
on the ground that the Carrier failed to comply with the requirements of Aule
47(c)
in that the claimant was not granted another "hearing" on appeal before the Super
intendent and
on the further ground that the charges against the claimant were not
substantiated.
It is questionable as to whether or not Rule
47(c)
contemplates a repetition (on appeal) of the full scale investigation held before the first hearing
officer as contended by the employes. However, it is not necessary for us to
decide that question inasmuch as it is not shown that the employes complied with
the technical requirement of Rule
47 (c)
in serving a copy of the demand for a
"hearing" upon the officer whose decision was being appealed, and the failure to
do so would be fatal insofar as the right to such a "hearing" is
concerned,
A review of the transcript of the
investigation reveals
that there ores
substantial evidence upon which to base a reasonable
finding that
the claimant
was guilty of gambling on Company property. The evidenec supporting the charge
that claimant had "roughed up" the Patrolman is less convincing,
The claimant had been employed by the Carrier for only a few months and
so far as the Board is informed ho has had a good record during that period of
service. Considering the nature of the evidence on the more: serious charge of
-2- Docket No.
41
roughing up the patrolman and the otherwise apparently good record of the claimant we find that dismissal was too severe; a penalty and that the claimant should
be restored to duty with seniority unimpaired but without pay for time lost,
AWAIM
Claim disposed of as indicated in Findings.
/s/ Francis J. jobertson
Francis J, Niobortson
Chairman
/s/ E. J. Hoffman /s/ T. S. Woods
E. J. Hoffman T. S. Woods
Employee Member Carrier Member
Dated at Baltimore, Maryland this
1st day of December,
1958