Special d of Adiustment No. 226
Aearings April 9-30, 1958
PARTIES TO MPU-TE:
°;
:THE
CRD'hR OF RATLRDAD TELEGRAPHERS
MISSOURI-1-?fSAS-TEXAS LINES
OR.T Claim 22-_2.7-22, that Telegrapher Cohen D. Smith was improperly and unwarrantedly dismissed from the Carrier's service on October 6, 1957 without sufficient cause; and that Telegrapher Smith shall now be returned to his former position and be paid for all time lost, less amount earned in any other service.
FjPTWt~ CS AND OFIN$Dh:
Gotten D. Smith was on duty on the third trick at the passenger station, Houston,
"Texas, ·when Signal Maintainer 1. H. Copeland and Section Foreman appeared at his
office about 2·!50 a.m. on October 6, 1957. Mr. Copeland entered the office. The
Section Foremen remained outside at the ticket window. Copeland informed Smith that
he wanted to use the dispatcher°s telephone to inform the Dispatcher that he and the
Section Foreman 'had Just replaced broken angle bare to the rails a few miles away and
had rsatored the signal system to normal at that point. Copeland had received a call
about the signal failure end after finding the trouble took the Section Foreman with
him to make ti;e repairs.
Smith refused to allow ·:-opeland to use the telephone. He told Copeland to
write out a message to report the matter and that he himself would transmit it. Copeland files! the requested message, addressed to his own superiors but not to the diepatcher. He then requested Smith to report the signal clearance to the Dispatcher
do hio:.praaan:aa.
.Ao
that be could have personal knowledge that his duty to report
promptly to the Dispatcher had been fulfilled. Smith refused to comply, but said
he would report the matter
to
the Dispatcher later. Copeland told Smith he would go
to another telephone at Eureka Tards (Houston) a few miles distance and report to the
Dispatcher himself, in view of Smith's unwillingness to comply then and there. This
he dial, with Smith presumably listening in.
The Superintendent promptly notified Smith of his dismissal from the service at
the end of his tour of
distv
at 7.00 a.m.,
"w f.nz
failure to perform his duties in a faithful, intelli-
gent, and courteous manner, and failure to cooperate with other
enployess in carrying out rules and instructions."
An investigation was requested, and held in Waco on October 25, 1957. Both
parties were adequately and properly represented.
The ORT contends that Smith met the situation presented by Copeland in conformity
with established rules-
PARTIES TO DISPUTE-
Under the
RAILWAY 3: AB O R
A C T
uptc-i
al isaard of
Ad
justment tdo,
Rear£ngs April 9-.3b, 5958
Dallas, `faxes
.9~,
ward No. 19
"1;.?E ORDER OF RAILROAD 'fET..E(RAEBERS
'MISSOURI-XARSAS-TEXAS LINES
t
ORmT
Claim 22-27-2L t-h t Telegrapher Cohen
D.
Smith was improperly and unwarrantsdly dismissed from the Carrier°s service an October 6, 1957 without
suf
ficient cause; end .hat Telegrapher Smith s"hall now be returned to his former position and be paid for a:!1 time lost, less amount earned in any other service.
1!1D?iDiGS APT!) OPINION:
Cohen D. Smith was on. duty on the third trick at the passenger station, Houston,
Texas, when signal ?,feintainer 1. :l. Copeland and Section Foreman appeared at his
office
aboKkt
v^5ii
A.m.
on October b, 1,957. Mr. Copeland entered the office. The
Section Fwremen remained outside at the
ticket
window. Copeland informed Smith that
he wanted to use the dispatcher"s telephone to inform the Dispatcher that he and the
Section Foreman 'had just replaced broken angle bars to the rails a few miles away and
had restored the signal wvstem to ,normal
at that
point. Copeland had received a call
about the signal failure and after finding the trouble took the Section Foreman with
him to make tie repairs.
Smith refused to allow Copeland to use the telephone. He told Copeland to
write out a message to report the matter and that he himself would transmit it. Copeland fale4 the requested message,, addressed to his own superiors but not to the dispatcher. 'Se then requested Smith to report the signal clearance to the Dispatcher
&a his,s:,lZrasaroacs,
4<r
that he could have personal. knowledge that his duty to report
prempty to the
Dispatcher had
been fulfilled, Smith refused to comply, but said
he would report the matter to tire Dispatcher later. Copeland told Smith he would go
to another telephone at Eureka Yards (Houston) a few miles distance and report to the
Dispatcher himself, in view of smith°s unwillingness to comply then and there. This
he did, with Smith presumably listening in.
The
Superintendent promptly notified Smith of his dismissal from the service at
the end of his tour of
auzy
at ?»OO a.m.,
..._:.rnt failure to perform his duties in
s
faithful, intelligent, and courteous manner, and failure to cooperate with other
employes in carrying out rules and instructions."
An investigation was requested, "and held in Waco on October 25, 1957. Both
parties ware adequately and prcperiy represented.
:?.'he OR't' contends that Smith :net ?:he situation presented by Copeland in conformity
with established rules.