Under the

RAILWAY LABOR ACT
Secial Board of Adsustment No.

Hearings April 9-30, 1958

Dallas, Texas
Award No. 2

PARTIES TO DISPUTE:

STATEMENT OF CLAIM:

THE ORDER OF RAILROAD TELEGRAPHERS

MISSOURI-KANSAS-TEXAS LINES

Group 1 ORT Claim No. 11-27-22 is on behalf of 3. H. Browning, Temple, Texas for a "call" (three hours pro rata) account train order No. 19 being copied at (Cobel) Temple at 2:03 a.m., May 13, 1957 by Assistant Superintendent W. L. Nigh, far Train No. 75, in violation of Rule 1 (a) and 1 (e).

FINDINGS:

Rule 1 (a) is applicable to this position and the train order in question..

Mr. Browning was on duty at this office in Temple at the time the Assistant Superintendent copied the train order by phone at another point in Temple (Cobel), 2 miles distant. He was not subject to "call" within the meaning Rule 1 (e). Rule 1 (e) is a "call" rule for an employe not on duty. It is to protect him against loss of work belonging to him under Rule 1 (a) if that work is required when he is not on duty.

AWARD:

Claim denied.

/s/ W. I. Christopher
W. I. Christopher, Employee Member
Deputy President, 0. R. T.
3860 Lindell Blvd.
St. Louis, Missouri

Dallas, Texas

August 1, 1958

Daniel C. Rogers, Chairman Fayette, Missouri.

/a/ A, F. Winkel
A_. F. Winkel, Carrier Member
Asst. General Manager
Missouri-Kansas-`Texas Lines
Dallas, Texas