BROZ7ERHOOD OF NONCE OF 4P3.' F1%IOYES

versus

MISSODRT PACIFIC RAILROAD WTANY


Award No. 1'79
Docket No. 179

SMEMEW




Claimant shall xcw be paid far all time lost during the period May 2.to October 30, 7981.

Any presumption that claiant laid off under false pretenses in order to accept outside employment by being seen at work elsewhere, was refuted by evidence that his car was in the garage for repair and that no other means of transportation try the location of his assignannt was available to him on April 9, 7381, which supports the reason he gave for laying off that day.

It is clear that he addressed obscene and abusive language to the roadmaster. In view of his length of service and absent any record of prior discipline, a reprimand would have been suitable discipline. Accordingly, the dismissal shall be reduced to a reprimand and clainent shall be cnpensated for any wage loss from May 2 to October 30, 1981, as he was reinstated effective October 31, 1981.

Claim sustained to the extent stated in the findings.

ADJUSIMENZ' NO. 279

Dudle

M. A: Cbristie, Ehploye Meter

San Antonio, Texas January 14, 7383
File 247-6220

L. . Brawn, Carrier Member