STECM
BOARD C ADJUSUMC NO. 279
BROTHERHOM OF MAINTENANCE CF MY EDEDIOYFS
versus
MISSOURI PACIFIC RASTRGAD CCMPANY
SIATEMMT
OF CIA324:
1. Carrier violated the agreement December 21, 1981,
- because Carrier failed to furnish Tradman
W. Fair, Jr., System Rail Gang 6801, five days'
aavancenotice that his job was to be abolished.
2. Claimant shall now be allowed forty hours at his
straight time rate.
FMDILS
: There is no dispute that claimant was not given the
notice of abolishment of his position as required by
rule 3(b). The carrier mntEnds that claimant suff
ered no actual loss of work. It is implicit in this
rule that carrier will give the notice required or
pay for the days involved.
It should be noted that work days for such notice
rn,-+a;ns
to scheduled days whether actually worked
by
the employe or not.
It appears that claimant received the notice on
December 30, 7980 and was paid through December 31
so his claim is valid for only four days.
AYMRD
: Maim sustained for four days pay.
SP BOARD OF ALUUSUMT NO i
279
C/
Dudley tang, Chainnary/'
~i
M. A. Christie, Employ Member L. D. Brown, ier Member
San Antonio, Texas
January 14, 1983
File247-6249