BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES

versus

MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY


STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee that:












FINDINGS: At the investigation the claimant stated that his
possession of railroad property was authorized by
long accepted practice. While there may be some question
whether the amount of some items and the inclusion of others
was comprehended by the practice shown, in a case of this
nature the claimant is entitled to the benefit of any doubt,
particularly in view of his long service and prior good record.

It appears that claimant cannot be reinstated to service because he was directed to report for service on July 5, 1983 but did not and he was subsequently terminated for failure to report for duty.

Accordingly, only the claim for lost pay from April 20, 1982 to July 5, 1983 is sutained, and under the agreement that is subject to deduction of earnings in other employment and unemployment compensation received during that time period.

AWARD: Claim sustained to the event stated in the findings.




M. A. Christie W. E. aro
Employee Member Carrier Member

March 9, 1984

File: 247-6387