SPECIAL BOARD OF ADJUST &IT N0. 279
Award No. 229
Docket No. 229
Mopac File 247-6800
Parties Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
to and
Dispute: Missouri Pacific Railroad Company
Statement
of Claim: 1. Carrier violated the effective Agreement when
the Woods Contractor Company put up forty crossing
buck signs on the Midland Valley Seniority Dis
trict in October and November, 1983 and deprived
Foremen Gerald G. Burge and Trackmen Howard McIntyre
and J. W. Curl of the right to perform said work.
2. Carrier also violated Article IV of the National
Agreement dated May 17, 1968 when it gave no
notice to the General Chairman of its intention
to contract the above work, which is Maintenance
of Way work.
3. Claimants Foreman Burge and Trackmen McIntyre
and Curl shall each be paid for a proportionate
share of the man hours consumed by Woods Contractor Company putting up crossing buck signs on
the Midland Valley Seniority District for a total
of eighty (80) hours.
Findings: The Board, after hearing upon the whole record
and all evidence, finds that the parties herein are Carrier
and Employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act,
as amended, that this Board is duly constituted by Agreement dated January 5, 1959, that it has jurisdiction of
the parties and the subject matter, and that the parties
were given due notice of the hearing held.
The Carrier, on December 6, 1982, entered into a contract
with Woods Dirt Contractors for the installation of crossbuck
signs on the Oklahoma, Wagoner and Midland Valley Subdivisions.
SBA 279
ward No. 229
The work was contracted at the request of the State of Oklahoma, which was to reimburse the Carrier for the cost of
installing the crossbucks.
The claims filed thereon were discussed in conference
on June 19, 1984. The General Manager agreed:
"It was agreed in conference, offer
was extended to pay eight hours pro
rata rate to each of the following:
Gerald G. Burge, H. McIntyre, and
J. W. Curl full settlement of the above
claim and not to be referred to again."
The General Chairman July 5, 1984 advised:
"At this conference you offered to
settle this claim by paying each
Claimant eight (8) hours.
Please be advised we are agreeable
to your offer. I would appreciate
your advising when this claim is paid."
The General Chairman, under date of July 27, 1984,
advised the Carrier that one of the Claimants was not satisfied with the settlement and that he now desired to carry
the claim forward.
The Board finds this claim to be moot. It was settled
by the highest designated representatives of the parties
on June 19, 1984.. Litigation ends when settlements are
entered into. Here, the litigation on this dispute ceased
June 19, 1984. This claim will be dismissed on the basis
of it having been previously settled.
Award: Claim dismissed as per findings.
SBA 279
-3- Award No. 229
A
.--Chr ~zfie, Employe
hib
e
Mpmh pr
nn on, Carrier Mem eer
Arthur T. Van Wart, Chairman
and Neutral Member
Issued August 23, 1986.