SPECIAL BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT N0. 279
Award No. 247
Case No. 247
File 247-6585
Parties Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
to and
Dispute Union Pacific Railroad Company
Statement
of Claim: (1) Carrier violated Agreement Rules 1(c) and 3(a) and
(C-2) account 24 B&B Subdepartment employes of Gangs 2804,
2805, and 2807 were not allowed to return to work on
September 22, 1982, or otherwise were not allowed to displace
junior employes working on System Bridge Gang 2806, following
the national BLE strike.
(2) All twenty-four Claimants shall now be allowed eight
hours' pay for each day of September 20, 21, 22, 23, and 24,
1982 at each man's respositive rate.
The Board has jurisdiction of this case.
The Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers initiated a national
strike at 12:01 AM on Sunday, September 19, 1982. The BLE concluded
its strike on Wednesday, September 22, 1982. The system B&B Gangs
were notified to not report for work until after the strike concluded.
The Employees were advised to report on Monday, September 27, 1982.
The Foremen of the Gangs were told that the railroad was "gearing back
up" and to advise their men that normal operations would resume at the
start of the shift on Monday, September 27, 1982.
These Claimants were assigned to a modified four day ten hours a
day, work week (Monday through Thursday, with Friday, Saturday and
Sunday off):
The claims appear to represent "laying behind the log." The
Claimants, belatedly sought, 66 days later, on November 17, 1982, to
file time claims which implied that they were w-illing to travel. Even
if recognized it,.meant they were saying 66 days later that they would
have travelled as much as 1,000 miles for one day's work on Thursday,
September 24th. There is no merit to the claim.
A denial Award will serve as well as a dismissal.
Award: Claims denied.
Summons, Jr., Empl eeMember ~~annon,Carrier Member
Arthur T. Van Wart, Chairman
and Neutral Member
Issued May 28, 1988.