Parties Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
 to and
 Dispute Union Pacific Railroad Company
 (Former Missouri Pacific Railroad Company)

 Statement
 of Claim: (1) Carrier violated the current working agreement,
 especially Rules 1, 2 and 11, in that Bulletin Nos. 36 and
 37 dated February 7, 1986, were for machine operators on
 spike drivers. These two bulletins did not list the numbers
 of these machines.

        (2) Carrier also violated the above-quoted rules account Bulletin Nos. 38, 39, 40, 41 and 42 have been bulletined as jobs of the Eastern District Tie Gangs. These jobs are Division jobs and should be bulletined as such.


        (3) We are therefore requesting that these jobs be rebulletined to the respective Division working with the District Tie Gang, and the machines be re-bulletined listing the numbers.


Findings: This Board has jurisdiction by reason of the Parties
 Agreement of January 5, 1959.
 This is the third in the series of similar cases
 referred to our Board. Those cases were decided by our
 Awards Nos. 288, 294, and 298 the findings of which by
 reference are incorporated herein.
 Employee objection was made to Bulletins Nos. 36
 through 42 that were bulletined February 7, 1986.
 Bulletins 36 and 37 were objected to because Carrier did not
 list the machine numbers for Spike Drivers for Machine
 Operators. While Bulletin 38, 39, 40, 41 and 42 were
 objected to because the Carrier bulletined them only to the
 District Tie Gang instead of to the Division.
 The issue raised was previously decided in our above
 cited Awards Nos. 288, 294 and 297 and are followed herein.

 Aw d: C m denied as er findings.

 S'117PPi~lno/
 Sol H on s, Jr. Empl Me her. nnbn, Carrier Member

                      Arthur T. Van Wart, Chairman and Neutral Member


Issued July 19, 1989.