Parties Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
 to and
 Dispute Union Pacific Railroad Company
 (Former Missouri Pacific Railroad

 Statement
 of Claim: (1) Carrier violated the Agreement, especially Rule 12,
 when B. R. Hollingsworth was dismissed from service on
 February 14, 1992.


Findings: The Board has jurisdiction of this dispute by reason
 of the Parties Agreement establishing this Board therefor.
 Claimant following a formal investigation was advised
 under date of February 14, 1992 that:
 "You are hereby advised the record has- this date been
 assessed dismissal account you were insubordinate when you
 failed to comply with instructions from Manager of Track
 Maintenance, D. R. Martin, in his letter of April 1, 1991,
 to remain drug free indefinitely as evidence by a positive
 test result of follow-up test given you at approximately
 8:30 A.M., Monday, September 16, 1991 in St. Louis,
 Missouri, while on duty as Trackman this is in violation of
 Rule 600 and 6073 (of Safety, Radio and General Rules for
 All Employees, effective October 1989).
 Your record now stands: dismissal from the Union Pacific
 Railroad."
 Claimant was accorded the due process to which
 entitled.
 There was sufficient evidence adduced to support the
 Carrier's conclusion that he was guilty of the charge placed
 against him. He was as pointed out in the dismissal not
 drug free. The Claimant is in the position that he finds
 himself in by such failure. The Board holds with Carrier's
 decision of dismissal and finds the discipline imposed is
 consistent with other similar cases placed before the Board.
 3

      Award: Claim denied.


      S. Hammons, Jr., EmplZee Member by exan e , Carrier ember


                          'an Wart, C alr and Neutral Member


Issued May 22, 1993.