SPECIAL BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT NO. 279
Award No. 615
Docket No. 615
File 930103
Parties Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
to and
Dispute Union Pacific Railroad Company
(Former MOPAC)
Statement
of Claim: (1) Carrier violated the Agreement, especially Rule 12,
when L. E. Ballard (SSN 435-19-9688) was assessed a fifteen
(15) day deferred suspension.
(2) Claim in behalf of Mr. Ballard for removal of the
fifteen (15) day deferred suspension from his record.
Findings: The Board has jurisdiction by reason of the parties
Agreement establishing the Board therefor.
Manager M/W Equipment Shop on September 21, 1992 at a
safety meeting, advised the employees of a new designated
parking location for shop employees. The Manager advised
the employees that if they failed to use the designated
parking location that they would be subject to discipline.
Manager Kendrick, on October 2, 1992, observed the
Claimant Ballard parking his car near the paint building at
the maintenance of way shop at Ft. Worth, TX. At the safety
meeting conducted on the same day, Manager Kendrick
questioned the Claimant as to whether he intended to move
the car. However, the Claimant did not move the car nor did
he comply with the instructions that had been issued by
Manager Ballard during the safety meeting on September 21,
1992.
As a result a formal investigation was held on the
charge:
"...you allegedly failed to comply with instructions from
the Manager of the M&W equipment shop, instructing you to
park in designated parking area on September 21, 1992. You
allegedly failed to comply with these instructions on
October 2, 1992."
The Carrier concluded Claimant culpable and assessed a
fifteen (15) day deferred suspension here appealed.
Award No. 615
The Board finds that the Claimant was accorded the due
process to which entitled.
There was sufficient evidence adduced to support
Carrier's conclusion as to the Claimant's culpability. The
fact that there had been no violation between September 22
and October 2, supports the reasonable conclusion that the
Claimant was well aware of the change in parking location
and the instructions given in connection therewith.
The discipline assessed is deemed reasonable. This
claim will be denied.
Award: Claim denied.
S. A. Hammons,~
Emplpele
Member
l
and Neutral Member
Issued January 31, 1994.
D. A. Ring, Carr er ember