s
SPECIAL BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT N0. 279
Award No. 627
Docket No. 627
File 930503
Parties Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
to and
Dispute Union Pacific Railroad Company
(Former Missouri Pacific)
Statement
of Claim: (1) Carrier violated the Agreement, especially Rule 12,
when D. R. Gibson, SSN 439-90-2926, was dismissed from
service on May
4,
1993.
(2) Claim in behalf of D. R. Gibson for removal of the
discipline. from his record and for wage loss suffered
beginning May 4, 1993 and continuing until Claimant is
reinstated to service with seniority, vacation and all other
rights unimpaired.
Findings: This Board has jurisdiction of this case by reason of
the parties Agreement establishing the Board therefor.
The Claimant Trackman Driver D. R. Gibson was working
as such on March 1, 1993. He reported receiving a personal
on duty injury to himself and during the discussion of the
incident while at the hospital, he asserted a threat "to
take out a gun to the gang and spray everyone." On March 9,
1993, he was notified to attend a formal investigation on
the charges:
"...you allegedly caused a personal injury to yourself when
you were throwing tie plates from switch ties that were
being removed and also for allegedly threatening the safety
of gang members who work with you on gangs 9161 and 9381."
The postponed investigation was held on April 6, 1993.
Carrier concluded from the investigation that Claimant was
culpable of the charges. He was dismissed from service as
discipline therefor on May
4,
1993.
The Board finds that the Claimant was accorded the due
process to which entitled under Rule 12. There were no
procedural errors so egregious that would serve as cause to
reverse the discipline imposed.
There was sufficient evidence adduced including the
admissions of Claimant to support the conclusions of
culpability reached by the Carrier. Although the Claimant
denied the thrust of the evidence, particularly his
admissions, given by Track Supervisor Turtle, Supervisor G.
A. Noll who accompanied Claimant to the hospital and the
written statement of Claims Representative Wilson, the
question of credibility thus raised was resolved by the
Carrier. It chose to believe the statement of its witnesses
as opposed to that of the Claimant and his witnesses. If
injured, it arose as a result of his own action. He was not
instructed to do any work. There was no evidence of animus
demonstrated to offset Carrier's discretionary right.
The higher priority in the imposition of the discipline
in this case concerns the threat that was made by the
Claimant to Supervisor Noll. He said, according to Noll,
"that at times Newton made him so mad that he felt like
bringing a gun out here and spraying everyone." That
statement on the Union Pacific is taken very seriously.
Some two years prior another maintenance of way laborer
brought a semi-automatic rifle on the property and shot his
supervisor and another fellow worker. That laborer was
considered by his co-workers to be a "mellow guy." That
laborer was later convicted and sentenced to a life term for
two felony counts of first degree murder. He also had a
complaint against his supervisor that he was worked too
hard. The Carrier, since then, rightfully, has been very
concerned in attempting to close off any repetition of such
an incident.
The Board finds that the Carrier had sufficient grounds
to impose the discipline assessed and cannot find that it
was in the circumstances unreasonable. This claim will be
denied.
Award: Claim denied.
~1111 11~
- AOUI.-.
Y?=4
ammons, Jr.I ployee Member D. A. Ring, Carri r tuber
Arthur T. Van Wart, Chairman
and Neutral Member
Issued
Brooksville, Florida June 27, 1994.