BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES

versus

MISSOURI 1ACIFIC RAILROAD COMFANY


STATEMENT OF CIAII: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:





FINDINGS: The evidence shows the foreman had on previous occasions been unsuccessful
in contacting claimant through the telephone number provided by the
claimant, but there is no evidence that this fact had been called to claimant's
attention. Had claimant been so notified, the Carrier would not be obligated to
attempt contact thereby.

Claim is made for 11 hours but it appears that 92 hours were worked by the junior man, so the claim is not valid beyond that time. Claim is for time and one-half, but under the decisions of the N.R.A.B. can be allowed only at pro rata for time not worked.

AWARD: Claim sustained to the extent stated in the Opinion.






(s) A. J. Cunningham (s) G. W. Johnson
A. J. Cunningham - Employe Member G. W. Johnson - Carrier Member

St. houis, Missouri
September 27, 1962
File 247-3872