PARTIES ) BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES
TO )
DISPUTE ) ST. LOUIS SOUTHWESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY

STATEMENT OF CLAIM:



FINDINGS:

The Board, after hearing upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that the parties herein are Carrier and Employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as amended; this Board has jurisdiction over,the dispute involved herein: and, the parties were given due notice of hearing thereon.


The record shows that although Claimant allegedly sustained a personal on the job injury on September 4, 1984 that he did not submit a personal injury report relative to such matter to the Carrier until October 29, 1984.


That Claimant would maintain he was not aware of the injury until October 12, 1984, or when he was advised to have corrective neck surgery, which thereafter took place on October 16, 1984, may not be said to have represented valid reason for Claimant not having promptly reported the alleged injury to the Carrier.


Even assuming arguendo, as the Organization urges, that Claimant did not realize the severity of his injury until such time as he began to suffer severe pain at a later date, the fact remains Claimant had discussed with Carrier's supervisors the need to be released from duty for the doctor's appointment on October 11, 1984, but had not at that time, according to Carrier witnesses, mentioned the injury as having been job related. Furthermore, the Claimant stated at the company hearing that he had seen a doctor on September 20, 1'984 and had also cancelled other ap-



S(3A a eD AWARD NO. 210
CASE NO. 297











          v

            R. aylor M. A. Christie

            Car4 Member Organization Member


      Houston, TX

      August 29, 1986


2