AWARD N0. 8
CASE N0.
7
SPECIAL BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT N0. 280
PARTIES : The Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
TO
DISPUTE : St. Louis Southwestern Railway Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM
:
"Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
(1) The Carrier violated the effective agreement when it established the
position of Highway Crossing Watchman at Tyler, Texas, with assigned hours from
7:00 a. m. to 11:00 a.m. and 3:00 P.m. to 7:00 P.m.
(2) Highway Crossing Watchman N. G. Morgan now be allowed four hours' pay at
the time and one-half rate for each workday of his work week for services as rendered between the hours of 3:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. beginning on December 23, 1957, and
to continue until the violation referred to in Part (1) of this claim is corrected.
(3) Highway Crossing Watchman G. H. Carroll now be allowed four hours' pay at
the time and one-half rate for each Saturday and Sunday for services as rendered
between the hours of 3:00 P.m. and 7:00 p.m. beginning on December 21 and 22, 1957,
and to continue until the violation referred to in Part (1) of this claim is corrected."
FINDINGS
:
The employes state that prior to December 21, 1957, the carrier employed two
crossing tenders working two shifts at North Spring Street, Tyler, Texas. The hours
of service for the second trick was 3:00 to 17.:00 P.m. seven days per week. Effective December 21, 1957, the carrier revised its crossing protection at North Spring
Street and set up new hours of service as 7:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. and 3:00 P.m. to
7:00 P.M., seven days per week. The carrier created a split shift. After this
change, crossing watchman, M. G. Morgan, the claimant, was assigned the new position,
Monday through Friday, five days per week, and crossing watchman, G. H. Carroll, the
claimant, was assigned the two day position, Saturday and Sunday. This new assignment required that the crossing tender commence his day at 7:00 a.m. and work till
11:00 a.m.. then suspend work for four hours and return to his job from 3:00 P.m.
to 7:00 P.m.
The employes state that the carrier violated Rule 7-10, Absorbing Overtime.
The carrier states that prior to December 16, 1944, there was contained in the
agreement between the carrier and this organization, Rule 7-10, Intermittent Service,
which read as follows:
- 2 - AWARD N0. 8 - StISW
"7-10.
Intermittent Service--Positions not requiring continuous
manual labor, such as track, bridge and highway crossing watchmen,
flagmen at railway non-interlocked crossings, lamp men, and pumpers, and the work of which is of a light and intermittent character will be paid a monthly rate which will compensate for all
services rendered for eight (8) hours' work within a spread of
twelve (12) hours for the calendar days per month, with overtime at rate of time and one-half thereafter on the actual
minute basis."
That effective December
16, 1944,
Rule
7-10,
Intermittent Service, read as follows:
"7-10.
Intermittent Service--Positions not requiring continuous
manual labor; such as, track, bridge and highway crossing watchmen, flagmen at railway non-interlocked crossings, lamp men, and
pumpers may be paid on a monthly or hourly rate basis. If
assigned hours are increased or decreased, monthly rates shall
be adjusted in accordance.with change in assigned hours. When
additional positions are established the rate shall be in conformity with that of existing positions of similar work and
responsibility in the same seniority district. The hours of
employees covered by this rule shall not be reduced below eight
per day for six days per week."
The changes in Rule
7-10
were brought about by a Memorandum of Agreement dated
October 21,
1944.
The Agreement under which this claim is filed became effective September 1,
1947,
and Rule
7-9,
Intermittent Service reads as follows:
"7-9.
Intermittent Service--Positions not requiring continuous
manual labor; such as, track, bridge and highway crossing watchmen, flagmen at railway non-interlocked crossings, lamp men, and
pumpers may be paid on a monthly or hourly rate basis. If
assigned hours are increased or decreased, monthly rates shall
be adjusted in accordance with change in assigned hours. When
additional positions are established the rate shall be in conformity with that of existing positions of a similar work and
responsibility in the seniority district. The hours of employees
covered by this rule shall not be reduced below eight
(8)
per day
for six
(6)
days per week."
The carrier further states that Rule
7-9
of the effective Agreement was retained as an Intermittent Service rule governing "positions not requiring continuous
manual labor." when revision of this rule was negotiated, effective December 16,
1944,
it was the intention of the parties to continue the assignment of employes to
perform a minimum days service within a spread of hours exceeding eight, exclusive
of meal period. That this was the intention of the Rule is further borne out by
the fact that Intermittent crossing watching assignments were maintained at Pine
Bluff, Arkansas, until April
1951
without any claim that such assignments were in
- 3 - AWARD N0. 8 - STLSW
violation of the Agreement. The deletion of the phrase "eight (8) hours work
within a spread of twelve (12) hours" had no effect of abrogating the carrier's
right to require assignment of eight hours work within a spread of more than eight
hours. On the contrary, this change merely eliminated the restriction that limited
the spread of hours in which eight hours work could be required.
The evidence submitted to the Board shows that prior to December
16, 1944,
the
Intermittent Service rule then known as Rule
7-10,
gave the carrier the right to
work crossing watchmen eight hours within a spread of twelve hours. However,
effective December 16,
1944,
that part of the rule concerning the working of eight
hours within the spread of twelve hours was eliminated and it was also eliminated
in the Agreement that is before us, which became effective September 1,
1947,
and is
now known as Rule
7-9.
The carrier's contention that under Rule
7-9,
the reason that the eight hours
within a spread of twelve hours was eliminated was to give to the carrier a larger
spread of hours to work an employee eight hours, is not well taken. The starting
time Rule, which is Rule 7-133(b), that refers to single shifts, states that employes
working single shifts, regularly assigned exclusively to day service, will start
'their work period between 6:00 a.m. and 8:00 a.m. There is no exception contained
in this rule relative to employees, such as watchmen, that are named under the
Intermittent rule. Rule 7-10, Absorbing Overtime, states that employes will not be
required to suspend work after starting a daily assigned work period for the purpose
of absorbing overtime. There is no exception in this rule that crossing watchmen,
whom the carrier contends work under the Intermittent Service rule, should be excluded from the operation of this rule.
The Board finds that when the carrier and the organization eliminated the
words "eight (8) hours within a spread of twelve (12) hours", that employes named
under the Intermittent Service rule, that were required to work eight hours per day,
would come under the other rules of the effective Agreement. Therefore, the carrier
violated Rule
7-9
when it required the claimant to work
7:00
a.m. to 11:00 a.m.,
and
3:00
P.m. to 7:00 p.m.
The evidence brought out at the hearing showed that claimant G. H. Carroll is
not and has not been working as a relief watchman for some period of time. Due to
extenuating circumstances that were brought out in the evidence in this case,
claims 2 and
3,
which are claims for compensation will be denied.
AWARD
:
Claim No. 1 sustained. Claim No. 2 and
3,
denied.
(s) Thomas C. Begley
Thomas C. Begley, Chairman
(s) A. J. Cunningham (s) M. L. Erwin
A. J. Cunningham, Employee Member M. L. Erwin, Carrier Member
Dated: May 18, 1960.