SPECIAL BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT N0.
285
BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES
VS.
Award No. 10
READING COMPANY Case No. 10
STATEMENT OF
CLAIM:
1. That the Carrier violated the Agreement by not assigning to its track
forces the work of removing and restoring its track at the Indian Head Coal Company on June 30, July 2 and
3, 1958.
2. That one track foreman and ten furloughed laborers on Sub-Division "B"
of the
Shamokin Division
be now paid three days pay each at their respective
rates of pay because of this violation of the Agreement.
OPINION OF BOARD
:
In
1958
Carrier granted permission to Indian Head Coal Company to install a
water line under its track on a branch adjacent to the colliery's property.
Carrier advised, however, that its own forces were to remove and restore the track,
and that Indian Head was to give information concerning when the work was to
commence. Through some misunderstanding, the colliery removed the track with its
own personnel, installed the water line, and was in the process of restoring the
track before Carrier discovered what was going on. Upon learning what had taken
place, Carrier stopped the colliery from proceeding further and completed the
track restoration with its own forces.
('' There is no showing of bad faith by the Carrier vis-a-vis the subject Agree-
ment. However, Management is responsible for work that is performed on its pro
perty. The track work in question clearly is reserved by the labor contract to
M of W employees. The Organization is not in a position to enforce this contract
against the colliery. We are therefore constrained to hold the Carrier liable for
what took place here.
Carrier asserts that furloughed employees, for whom claim is made, would not
have done the involved work in any event, since employees on the active payroll
were scheduled to perform it. The question as to which individuals are to be
granted compensation where a violation has occurred is only incidental to the
claim, however.
We are not entirely satisfied that the amount of time for which pay is requested was actually consumed by the colliery's forces in performing the track
work involved. The claim should be sustained only to the extent of time spent on
the subject track work by the colliery's personnel.
AWARD
: Claim sustained to the extent indicated above.
(s) Lloyd H. Bailer
Lloyd H. Bailer, Chairman
(s) A. J. Cunningham (s) H. F. Wyatt, Jr.
A. J. Cunningham, Employe Member H. F. Wyatt, Jr., Carrier Member
Philadelphia, Pa
., June 26,
1959