r · r



PARTIES: BROTHERFIOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES
and
THE BALTIMORE AND OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY
AWARD IN DOCKET N0. 1+

STATEMENT "Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
OF CLAIM:
(1) The Carrier violated the effective Agreement when it assigned other than Bridge and Building Mechanics to perform the work of painting three (3) Air Tanks at Washington, Indiana;

(2) B&B Mechanic George R. Taylor now be allowed eight (8) hours' straight time pay account of the violation referred to in part one (1) of this claim."

FINDINGS: The Third Party issue is raised here by the Carrier. We ruled on
this point in the Award in Docket No. 1, and adopt the same position here.

The Carrier is charged here with violating the effective agreement 'brhen it assigned other than Bridge and Building Mechanics to perform the work of painting three (3) air tanks at Washington, Indiana."

Organization relies heavily on Section (b), sub-section 6, paragraph (b) of the Scope Rule:







The air tanks in question are located between the Back Shop and the Coach Shop at Washington, Indiana. Organization notes these tanks were "not within store rooms or oil houses."

It is Carrier's contention, essentially, that the Organization has never before contended that this particular work of painting air tanks belonged to B&B forces; that Rule 138 of Carmen's agreement gives this work to shop crafts' employees. It offers in evidence Motive Power Department circular and bulletin to support its claim that employees under the Shop Crafts' agreement have done this work.

The same parties, the same type of claim, the same issues and the same argument were before the Referee in Award 8093 of the Third Division.

The contracting parties here, in that portion of the Rule previously quoted, explicitly excluded "maintenance and painting material bins and tanks within store rooms or oil houses."

Storage bins were involved in Award 8093: air tanks are involved here. These tanks are not "within store rooms or oil houses."
s6AaR~l

DOCKET N0. 4

It being a cardinal rule of contract construction that where an exception is specifically and expressly set forth, no other may be implied, a sustaining Award is here in order, as it was in Award 8093.

AWARD

Claim sustained.

(s) A. J. Cunningham


Dated at Baltimore, Maryland, this 28th day of March, 1960.

(s) Edward A. Lynch

Edward A. Lynch

Chairman


(s) T. S. Woods
T. S. Woods
Carrier Member