BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES

versus

THE CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY


STATEMENT OF CLAIM:





OPINION OF BOARD:

On or about May 1, 1959 the Carrier began construction of a new siding serving the Continental Can Company at Carteret, N. J. The necessary preparation of a sub-grade for the new track required the use of a bulldozer but the Carrier's bulldozer was in the shop in an irreparable condition. The Carrier had a new bulldozer on order but this machine was not scheduled to arrive in sufficient time to enable the Carrier to meet the June 1, 1959 deadline imposed by Continental. Can's general contractor for completion of the siding. The Carrier contacted several local firms for the purpose of renting a bulldozer to be operated by one of its operators. All of these firms refused to rent a bulldozer on a short-term basis, however, unless one of their own employes operated the equipment. A bulldozer operated by an employe of the renting firm was therefore used to perform the subject grading work. Hence the present claim.

We conclude that the work in question is covered by the subject agreement. We also note that it is work, rather than equipment, over which the contract between the parties holds jurisdiction. Because of certain unusual circumstances surrounding this case, however, we conclude that the requested compensation is not warranted.



        Part (1) of the claim sustained. Part (2) of the claim denied.


                    (s) Lloyd H. Bailer

                Lloyd H. Bailer, Neutral Member


(s) A. J. Cunningham (s) C. S. Strang
A. J. Cunningham, Employe Member r _d. _S.Strang, Carrier-Member

Jersey City, N. J. January 25, 1962