SPECIAL BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT N0. 293
BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES
versus
THE CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
1. Claim that the carrier violated the effective agreement when on
October 71,
1960,
it assigned or otherwise permitted a Motive
Power Department employee to make repairs to the Gradall machine
at Port Reading, N. J.
2. That Edward Demba, who holds seniority as a Repairman on the Central
Division now be reimbursed the equivalent number of hours spent by
the Motive Power Department employee in performing this work on
October 11,
1960.
OPINION OF BOARD:
On October 11,
1960,
the Operator of the Carrier's Gradall machine, then
located at Part Reading, notified the Foreman in the Work Equipment Shop by telephone that the machine's boom had become inoperative and that prompt repair was
necessary so that the Grada7l could be moved to another location that day. The
operator advised that he had lost the locking rings holding the boom in place
and that he did not have the necessary tools. The absence of these locking rings
prevented retraction of the boom so that it could be put in traveling position.
Upon receiving this advice, the Shop Foreman assigned a Machinist (a Motive Power
Department employee) to go to a local store to purchase two locking rings and to
go to Port Reading to make the necessary repair.
The contention in the subject claim is that Edward Demba, who holds seniority
as a M of W Repairman on the Central Division, should have been used to perform
the repair work in question. It is Repairman Demba's regular assignment to perform repair work on the Carrier's various work equipment on the line of the road.
At the time that the above-described repair work was needed on the Gradall machine,
however, Claimant Demba was at Bridgeton making repairs on a Payloader and motor
car, among other duties. Bridgeton is approximately 115 miles south of Port
Reading, where the disabled Grandall was located. The Machinist was sent from
Elizabethport, which is approximately 7 miles north of Port Reading.
The repair work which arose on the Gradall machine on the instant occasion
is work which is covered by the M of W Agreement, As a general proposition,
therefore, Claimant Demba should have been used for his work. Since he was fully
engaged on another repair job at a distant location at the time involved, and
since it was necessary to repair the GraAall machine promptly so that it could
be moved to another location the same day, it obviously was not practicable to
assign Repairman Demba to the disputed task. In view of these circumstances,
Part 1 of the claim will be sustained but Part 2 will be denied.
AWARD N0. 28
CASE NO. MW 291
_ 2 _
A WAR D: Part 1 of the claim is sustained. Part 2 of the claim is denied.
/sd/ Lloyd H. Bailer
Lloyd H. Bailer, Neutral Member
/sd/ A. J. Cunningham /sd/ C. S. Strang
A. J. Cunningham, Employee Member C. S. Strang, Carrier Member
Jersey City, N. J.
October 13,
1964.