BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES

versus

THE CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY


STATEMENT OF CIAIM :





OPINION OF BOARD :

As the Carrier sees this case, the complaining employes were properly disci planed because they walked off the job without permission and also refused to work in an emergency until the emergency condition was cleared. The Organization denies any improper conduct on the part of the claimants. It requests that the disciplinary action taken be revoked and that the involved employes be compensated for their wage loss suffered.

This Board is strongly of the opinion that the action of an employe in leaving his job without permission during his tour of duty cannot be condoned. It should be noted, however, that considerable confusion existed on the morning in question. It also should be noted that supervision failed to conduct a vote among the affected employes before the end of the first two hours of the trick, as was contractually required in the subject situation. In view of all of the factors involved in this case, we conclude that the 15-day recorded suspension assessed against the claimants should be allowed to stand. We further conclude that the claimants should be compensated in the amount of one-half of the wage loss suffered by virtue of their actual suspension, it being understood that no pay is claimed for December 4, 1957.






                  Lloyd H. Bailer, Neutral Member


(s) A. J. Cunningham (s) C. S. Strang
A. J. Cunningham, Employe Member C. S. St
                                    rang, Carrier Member


Jersey City, N. J. November 30, 1959