~~CEj V~
SPECIAL BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT N0. 305
AWARD NO. 30
AUG S '19s~
THE ORDER OF RAILROAD TELEGRAPHERS DOCKET N0: 30
VS.
(CASE 2934)
ISER
MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
(Southern & Western Districts)
STATEMENT OF CIAIM:
"Claim of the General Committee of The Order of Railroad Telegraphers on the
Missouri Pacific Railroad, that:
1. Carrier violated the'scope rule, Rule 1, of the Telegraphers' Agreement when on August 28, 1958, and on each succeeding day, it required
employes at Osawatomie to place train orders in a pneumatic tube for
delivery to train service employes at a distant location and thus deprived the telegraphers of the work of delivering the orders, which
work is reserved to the telegraphers.
2. Carrier violated the Rule 1 of the Telegraphers' Agreement when it
declared the telegrapher position at SK Jet. abolished when the work
of handling train orders still exists and was merely removed from
the former location.
3. Carrier shall now compensate the following telegraphers for eight (8)
hours each work day at the pro rata rate of pay and shall pay any .
other employe adversely affected by this violation.
Following are the employes affected:
H. S. Weissenfluh
A. P. Hoyt
#'K. L. Walker
R. A. Talbott
A. E. Crossno
lst Trick
2nd "
3rd "
Swing
SK Jet.
n
One (1) day week tail end job.
Third trick open as of this date and unassigned, allowing the oldest
extra man this time."
OPINION OF BO?.RD:
The claims before us involve the handling and delivery of train orders at Osawatomie, Kansas, by the use of a pneumatic tube system. The facts show that a telegrapher copied the train order from the dispatcher and dispatched them via pneumatic
tube operating between the relay office and the yard office, where said train orders
were received by the conductor and engine crew. It is contended by the Organization
that after the train 'orders were received by the conductor, the orders were then
delivered in one instance by a clerk in an automobile to the head end of the train,
and in another instance by a yard engine to the head end. The Organization contends
that this constituted a violation of the Telegraphers' Agreement in that the pneumatic
tube system used by Carrier resulted in the handling of train orders by persons outside the Scope of the effective Agreement.
AWARD N0. 30 PAGE 2
DOCKET N0. 30
Carrier contends that it in no way has violated the provisions of the Scope
Rile
involved; that the train orders in question were properly received'by the telegrapher
from the dispatcher; that the telegrapher properly dispatchgd the train orders by,
means of a pneumatic tube as required by Carrier, and that under proper instructions
the orders were properly received by the train crew members. Carrier further contends
that when the train orders were properly placed in the pneumatic tulies.by the:tele8rapher as instructed, that, insofar as the telegrapher is concerned, delivery was
complete, and. his responsibility for the delivery ceased.
The Carrier, in presenting this case to the Board, relied upon the principles
announced in Third Division Awards Nos. 7343 and 8327 as being applicable here.
The Organization further contends that Carrier, by abolishing the telegrapher
positions at SK Junction in the Central Kansas Division seniority dibtrict, transferred the work of those positions to another seniority district, JN Relay. That
by the action of Carrier, transfer of work from SK Junction to the Relay JN Office,
located a short distance from the yard office, where the orders were received by
train crews, constituted a violation of the Agreement between the parties. The record does not support this contention.
The record shows that Carrier was engaged in a program of mordernization of its
property at Osawatomie. Prior to the advent of CTC operations, the telegraphers' positions at SK Junction were to operate the manual interlocking system. When CTC was
installed, the primary work performed by telegraphers no longer existed and the work
of receiving and delivering train orders was reduced to a minimum. As a result of
the new
amt
improved operations installed at SK Junction, the telegrapher positions
were abolished'and the handling of train orders was transferred to Relay JN Office,
where operators dispatched train orders by means of a pneumatic tube connected with
the yard office, where such train orders were received by the train crews to whom
such orders were addressed. There is nothing contained in the record to show that
any person,
is
any shape or form, handled such train orders from the time the JN operator dispatched the train orders via the tube until they were received by the train
crew.
The claimants were divested of dominion over and possession of the thing to be
delivered, and surrender was complete when, as instructed by proper authority, they
placed the train orders in the pneumatic tube for dispatch to the conductor. See
Award No. 7343.
FINDINGS: Carrier did not violate the Agreement as alleged, nor are the claims supported by the record here.
AWARD: Claims denied.
SPECIAL BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT N0. 305
/s/ Donald F. McMahon
Donald F. McMahon - Chairman
/s/ R. K. Anthis /J/ G. W. Johnson
R. K. Anthis - Organization Member G. W. Johnson - Carrier Member
St. Louis, Missouri
June 3, 1960
File 380-1892