O.R.T. Case 1902


                SPECIAL BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT NO. 310


                The Order of Railroad Telegraphers


                          and


                The Pennsylvania Railroad Company


    STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Denial of Nick Homick's Time cards for August 26, 31,

    September 1, 2, 7, 9, 14, 15, 16, 21,-22, 29, 1953, account of crews throwing switches in Allen Lane Interlocking." (Philadelphia Terminal Division -System Docket No. 225)


    FINDINGS:


Carrier abandoned Allen Lane Block and Interlocking Station, and certain switches and crossovers, which had been operated through the Interlocking at Allen Lane by the Operator-clerk then assigned, were changed to hand operated switches and crossovers.

A local freight services various industries on the Chestnut,Hi11 branch once a day, excepting Saturday and Sunday. Since Allen Lane Block and Interlocking Station was abolished, train service employees have been required to operate the hand thrown switches for the movement of their own trains.

Organization contends "these crews are doing work formerly done by the Operator-clerk, and so are violating our agreement that our work belongs to us and their work to them."

    Regulation 4-S-1 of the applicable agreement states


    "(a) An employee shall not be required to throw switches, except in cases of emergency, unless the regular duties of the position involved include the performance of such service.


    "(b) When the duty of throwing ground switches is regularly assigned to a position, the rate of pay of such position shall be adjusted by agreement, in writing, between the duly accredited representative and the proper officer of the Company."


It is argued on behalf of the Organization that the Carrier should have negotiated with the Organization on this matter.

    We do not agree.


Regulation 4-S-1 shows an aversion, generally, on the part of employees here petitioning, to throwing ground switches. The Regulation clearly empowers-Carrier to require these employees to throw ground switches only (a) in an emergency or (b) where such duty is among the regular duties of the position involved.
                                          S(3A 310 Iwb t2


                          DISSENT


No Board of Adjustment has the authority to modify or amend existing rules but that is what-we'find the end result to be based on the "Findings" and "Award" of the majority. The Third Division ruled in Award No. 5703;

        " *** we cannot make a rule nor modify existing rules ***.

        Renegotiation thereof in the manner provided by the Railway

        Labor Act is the proper source of authority for that purpose."


Arbitration Award No. 153 awarded a train order rules it did not amend the Scope Rule of the currently effective agreement extant between the parties. Yet here we have the majority making a finding and an award that has gone beyond the Arbitration Award. The majority has here actually modified and amended the Scope Rule.

Arbitration Award No. 153 awarded a rule which would not require Train and Engine Service Employes to copy train orders, except in emergencies, at points where and during the hours when Block or Telegraph or Telephone Operators are scheduled to be on duty, or at block stations which have been closed or abolished since May 1, 1938, or at block limit stations which have been closed or abolished since May 1, 1938 or which may thereafter be established. The Scope Rule of the agreement contains the classifications: "Telegraphers, TelephoneOperators (except Telephone Switchboard Operators), Block Operators." The Arbi- tration Board awarded a train order rule as attested by the following:

"NATIONAL MEDIATION BOARD

ARBITRATION BOARD

Arbitration Case No. 153

Case No. A-3521


In the Matter Of:

DISPUTE BETWEEN THE PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY AND ITS EMPLOYES REPRESENTED BY THE BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS, BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE FIREMEN AND ENGINEMEN, BROTHERHOOD OF RAILROAD TRAINMEN, AND THE ORDER OF RAILROAD TELEGRAPHERS

                  AWARD OF BOARD OF ARBITRATION


Pursuant to an arbitration agreement entered into by the above named parties on March 28, 1951, in accordance with the provisions of the Railway Labor Act, the Board of Arbitration consisting of Winfield G. Salmonson, Carrier-named member, C. H. Keenan, Employ:-named member, and David L. Cole, neutral arbitrator, who was designated Chairman, having duly heard the parties and considered their evidence and arguments, does hereby make its award as follows:

1. It declines to award the rule proposed by the Organization as set forth in Paragraph Fourth of the aforementioned arbitration agreement.

2. It awards a rule in the language following, to become effective on February
15, 1952, and to continue in effect until it is changed or modified in accordance
with the provisions of the Railway Labor Act, as amended:
                ® · SBA 310

                Aw D %7-


                            -2-


"'Except in emergencies, Train and Engine Service Employes shall not be required to copy train orders at points where, and during the hours when Block or Telegraph or Telephone Operators are scheduled to be on duty, or at block stations which have been closed or abolished since May 1, 1938, or at block limit sta tions-which have been established since May 1, 1938, or which may hereafter be established.

(1) The emergencies referred to shall include only storms, washouts, tornadoes, obstructions to tracks, slides, accidents, casualties, wrecks, engine or equipment failures, hot boxes, or break-in-two's, provided such cause or causes would result in serious delay and were not anticipated by the train dispatcher when the train was at the last open block or telegraph station.

(2) At block stations which have been closed on certain tricks or during certain hours continuously since hay 1, 1938, the restrictions of this rule shall not apply on such tricks, or during such hours.

(3) The train orders referred to in this rule are those of the type now designated as Form 19 Train Orders in their various forms, and as illustrated on pages 35 through 42 of the Carrier's Book of Rules, edition of September 25, 1949.

(4) The restrictions of this rule shall not apply to temporary block stations which have been closed or abolished or which may hereafter be closed-or abolished. Temporary block stations as referred to herein, are defined to be block stations opened for a temporary limited purpose only, such as the clearing or repairing of tracks, bridges or other facilities, construction projects, or the movement of some special purpose train or trains.'

                              BOARD OF ARBITRATION


                              /s/ David L. Cole

                              Neutral Arbitrator and. Chairman


/s/ Winfield G. Salmonson, Carrier Arbitrator December 12, 1951

                DISSENT BY BOARD MEMBER C. H. KEENAN


I consider the award agreed to by the majority of the members of this Arbitration Board to be very improper and unjust to the involved employes; it seriously discriminates against them, and is not responsive to the evidence of record. Moreover,.this award fails to require the correction of practices that violate the inherent fundamental principal of craft rights and representation as contemplated by the Railway Labor Act, as amended.

Therefore, I decline to participate in the rendition of the award.

                              /s/ C. H. Keenan, Board Member."

              · · SSA 310

              (~wD 1Z


                          -3-


As may be noted the rule, directed at Train and Engine Service Employes, is that they shall not be required to copy train orders .<e at block stations closed or abolished after May 1, 1938, or at block limit stations established after that date except in emergencies. An Understanding, reached in 1938 between the parties, not only embraced the handling of train orders by Train and Engine Service Employes but all other block operator's work as well, such as blocking and reporting trains, handling switches and clearance cards, transmission and receiv- ing messages, and all other related duties assigned and accruing to the block station positions at the time of abolishment. The Arbitration award did not alter or otherwise annul the Scope Rule or the Oral Understanding as to block operator's work being off limits to other employes if the office was one closed after May 1, 1938.

The Arbitration award is supplemental to the Scope Rule and to the Oral Understanding of May 1, 1938, it is not a substitute thereof, hence we here have an erroneous awards

                              /s/ Russell J. Woodman


                              Russell J..Woodman

                              Employe Member