O.R.T. Case No. 1875 (TE-8471)
SPECIAL BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT N0. 310
The Order of Railroad Telegraphers
and
The Pennsylvania Railroad Company
STATEMENT OF CIAIMe "Claim of The Order of Railroad Telegraphers on
the Pennsylvania Railroads Cincinnati Division
that Operator G. T. Nave be paid the daily pro rata rate of pay of
Relief Section No. 6, beginning on and including Sept. 18, 1953, for
every day he is held off this Relief Job." (Cincinnati Division
Case No. 110 - System Docket No. 239)
There are three pertinent facts in this record which require a denial
award.
1. Claimant did not apply when this position was first
advertised as a temporary vacancy. Laudenslager did,
2. A knowledge of typing is a prime requirement in this
position. Claimant had no typing ability or experience.
Laudenslager had two years typing experience.
3. Carrier offered Claimant the same total number of days
Laudneslager used in qualifying. The offer was rejected.
AWARD-
Claim denied.
Signed this 10th day of Aprils 1961.
/s/ E. A. Lynch
E. A. Lynch, Chairman
/s/ C. E. Alexander
C. E. Alexander, Carrier Member R. J. Woodman, Employe Member
5QA
3/0
/dWD 2i
DISSENT TO DOCKET TE-8471
This member cannot agree that the three pertinent facts
which the majority says requires a denial Award are controlling
here:
1. Because Claimant did not apply for a position on a
temporary basis when first advertised has no bearing on his
qualifications for the position on a permanent basis, and was
not an issue in the instant claim.
2. The second fact referred to by the majority was fully
discussed in the Employes' Submissions and bears no repeating
here, except to reiterate that other employes were assigned to
positions in "C" Office without this "Prime requirement." It
should also be noted that Laudenslager, with two years typing
experience, resigned from the service of the Carrier and never
did qualify on all the positions to be worked in Relief Section
No. 6.
3. Laudenslager spent a total of 41 days in "C" Office
learning to operate the teletype machine. At the insistence
of the Organization the Carrier offered Claimant a total of
7 days to qualify on the same machine. Before resigning,
Laudenslager had posted for 52 days on all portions of Relief
Section No. 6 while Claimant posted 23 days on all portions
except "C" Office. Even by adding the 7 days he would have a
total of 30 days, while Laudenslager received 52 days and would
have been given more time if he had not resigned. Notwithstanding the facts, the Board has erroneously concluded that the Claimant was offered the same total number of days as Laudenslager.
The Award is erroneous based on the factual evidence in
this case.
/s/ Russell J. Woodman
Russell J. Woodman, ___
Employe Member
---
~=
~r
i~J. f,
t.
~iI
,`' 1_ct