The Pennsylvania Railroad Company


    STATEMENT OF CLAIM : "Claim of Extra Block Operator, R. W. Culhane

    for compensation March 28, 1954 on which date

    he was available at a time Train Order was copied at Smith, a closed

    Block Station, by Engineman Extra 4787 East." (Philadelphia Division

    Case No. 14149 - System Docket No. 242)


                  FINDINGS :


                  Here a Train Order was copied at a closed block station.


Carrier offers as a defense that its action here is expressely sanctioned by Arbitration Award No. 153 where it excepts "emergencies" from the application of the Award itself. Carrier states the difficulty encountered -a broken rail -- falls within the Award's citation of 'obstruction to tracks" as one of the emergency situations constituting an exception. It was necessary to cut off the power.

 It is agreed the delay involved a loss of 11 minutes. Had Carrier acted as Organization now asserts, it would have required Claimant Block Operator R. W. Culhane "two hours to reach Smith and handle the train order in question," because Claimant lived 45 miles away according to Carrier argument.

 Arbitration Award No. 153 stipulates that the listed emergencies, in order to relieve Carrier of the obligations of that Award, will be those which "would result in serious delay."

 Certainly 11 minutes do not constitute "serious delay." We believe that a broken rail would constitute an obstruction to the track. It is safe to assert that the broken rail could not have been anticipated.

 We will deny this claim because the facts fall within the context of the cited emergency "obstruction to tracks." It would be vain for us to now say Carrier should have called Claimant, when it was able to act as it did and confine the delay to 11 minutes.

    AWARD :


    Claim denied.


    Signed this 10th day of April, 1961.


                  /s/ E. A. Lynch

                  E. A. Lynch, Chairman


/s/ C. E. Alexander
 C. E. Alexander, Carrier Member R. J. Woodman, Employe Member
                . . g15A 3 is

                A uo


                          DISSENT


No Board of Adjustment has the authority to modify or amend existing rules but that is what we find the end result to be based on the "Findings" and "Award" of the majority. The Third Division ruled in Award No. 5703:

        " *** we cannot make a rule nor modify existing rules ***.

        Renegotiation thereof in the manner provided by the Railway

        Labor Act is the proper source of authority for that purpose."


Arbitration Award No. 153 awarded a train order rule, it did not amend the Scope Rule of the currently effective agreement extant between the parties. Yet here we have the majority making a finding and an award that has gone beyond the Arbitration Award. The majority has here actually modified and amended the Scope Rule.

 Arbitration Award No. 153 awarded a rule which would not require Train and Engine Service Employes to copy train orders, except in emergencies, at points where and during the hours when Block or Telegraph or Telephone Operators are scheduled to be on duty, or at block stations which have been closed or abolished since May 1, 1938, or at block limit stations which have been closed or abolished since May 1, 1938 or which may thereafter be established. The Scope Rule of the agreement contains the classifications: "Telegraphers, Telephone Operators (except Telephone Switchboard Operators), Block Operators." The Arbitration Board awarded a train order rule as attested by the followings

"NATIONAL MEDIATION BOARD

ARBITRATION BOARD

Arbitration Case No. 153

Case No. A-3521


    In the Matter-Of:


    DISPUTE BETWEEN THE PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY AND ITS E24PLOYES-REPRESENTED BY THE BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS, BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE FIREMEN AND ENGINEMEN, BROTHERHOOD OF RAILROAD TRAINMEN,, AND THE ORDER OF RAILROAD TELEGRAPHERS.


                  AWARD OF BOARD OF ARBITRATION


    Pursuant to an arbitration agreement entered into by the above named parties on March 28, 1951, in accordance with the provisions of the Railway Labor Act, the Board of Arbitration consisting of Winfield G. Salmonson, Carriernamed member, C. H. Keenan, Employ:-named member, and David L. Cole, neutral arbitrator, who was designated Chairman, having duly heard the parties and considered their evidence and arguments, does hereby make its award as follows-


    1. It declines to award the rule proposed by the Organization as set forth

    in Paragraph Fourth of the aforementioned arbitration agreement.

                                      S 5A 3 110


                                      ,A,N a


. It awards a rule in the language following, to become effective on February 15, 1952, and to continue in effect until it is changed or modified in accordance with the provisions of the Railway Labor Act, as amended:

 'Except in emergencies, Train and Engine Service Employes shall not be required to copy train orders at points where, and during the hours when Block or Telegraph or Telephone Operators are scheduled to be on duty, or at block stations which have been closed or abolished since May 1, 1938, or at block limit stations which have been established since May 1, 193_8, or which may hereafter be established.

 (1) The emergencies referred to shall include only storms, washouts, tornadoes, obstructions to tracks, slides, accidents, casualties, wrecks, engine or equipment failures, hot boxes, or break-in-two's, provided such cause or causes would result in serious delay and were not anticipated by the train dispatcher when the train was at the last open block or telegraph station.

 (2) At block stations which have been closed on certain tricks or during certain hours continuously since May 1, 1938, the restrictions of this rule shall not apply on such tricks, or during such hours.

 (3) The train orders referred to in this rule are those of the type now designated as Form 19 Train Orders in their various forms, and as illustrated on pages 35 through 42 of the Carrier's Book of Rules, edition of September 25, 1949.

 (4) The restrictions of this rule shall not apply to temporary block stations which have been closed or abolished or which may hereafter be closed or abolished. Temporary block stations as referred to herein, are defined to be block stations opened for a temporary limited purpose only, such as the clearing or repairing of tracks, bridges or other facilities,construction projects, or the movement of some special purpose train or trains.'

                            BOARD OF ARBITRATION


                            /s/ David L. Cole,

                            Neutral Arbitrator and Chairman


                            /s/ Winfield G. Salmonson,

                            Carrier Arbitrator


December 12, 1951

            DISSENT BY BOARD MEMBER C. H. KEENAN


I consider the award agreed to by the majority of the members of this Arbitration Board to be very improper and unjust to the involved employes; it seriously discriminates against them, and is not responsive to the evidence of record. Moreover, this award fails to require the correction of practices-that violate the inherent fundamental principal of craft rights and representation as contemplated by the Railway Labor Act, as amended.

 Therefore, I decline to participate in the rendition of the award.

                            / s/ C. H. Keenan, Board Member."

                                        5BA 3m ~wu fo


                            -3-


As may be noted the rule, directed at Train and Engine Service Employes, is that they shall not be required to copy train orders ... at block stations closed or abolished after May 1, 1938, or at block limit stations established after that date except in emergencies. An Understanding, reached in 1938 between the parties, not only embraced the handling of train orders by Train and Engine Service Employes but all other block operator's work at well, such as blocking and reporting trains, handling switches and clearance cards, transmission and receiving messages, and all other related duties assigned and accruing to the block station positions at the time of abolishment. The Arbitration award did not alter or otherwise annul the Scope Rule or the Oral Understanding as to block operator's work being off limits to other employes if the office was one closed after May 1, 1938.

 The Arbitration award is supplemental to the Scope Rule and to the Oral Understanding of May 1, 1938, it is not a substitute thereof, hence we here have an erroneous award.

                                /s/ Russell J. Woodman


                                Russell J. Woodman

                                Employe Member