t0EC T j '~`O


r ~' VS.



STATEMENT OF
CLAIM




















- SeA 3a-1
CQ se I
FINDINGS: On April 25, 1958 the Carrier wrote to the General Chairman, ORT,
that, because of a decrease in the volume of work and the number of
transactions handled by station agents and agent-telegraphers, it de
sired to discuss proposed consolidation or dualization of some of those
positions. There were conferences on May 1 and 26 and June 4, 1958
without agreement. On June 6th the Carrier advised the General Chair
man that, although he did not concur with the proposal, its position
was that the rules of agreement did not prevent the changes proposed
and that it would proceed with the program of dualization.
On June 10, 1958 the Organization served notice under Section 6 of
the Railway Labor Act, as amended, to add to the agreement the follow
ing rule:
"No position in existence on April 1, 1958, will be
abolished or discontinued except by agreement be
tween the Carrier and the Organization."














The Third Division, N.R.A.B., has consistently interpreted agreements like that in effect between these parties, wherein positions have been established by negotiation, to obligate the Carrier, in eliminating or combining positions, to follow the established procedure for modification of the agreement except when such action is due to a substantial disappearance of the work and duties for which the position was created or to a substantial change in the service required since the position was negotiated into the agreement. Awards 388, 434, 496, 556, 1521, 3659, 5384, 5507, 5641, 6451 and 8211.

The Carrier asserts that some if not all of those awards were reversed by Award 6945. However, it does not appeal that such award is inconsistent, because it was there shown that the work and service required at a one man station had declined substantially, the station was closed and a few incidental duties were assigned to an agent at a nearby station. The factual showing there would justify the abolishment of that position under the criteria set forth in the foregoing awards.

It appears that the positions involved here were last considered in negotiations in 1951 because it was at that time that the Gettysburg position was changed from Telegrapher-Clerk to Agent-Telegrapher and converted to a monthly rated instead of an hourly rated position.

There is no evidence here as to the work and duties of the positions or the service required or traffic handled at those stations at that time. There is in evidence some data as to business handled in 1956, 1957, 1958 and 1959, which shows some diminution from 1956 to 1958. However at the time of this action by the Carrier and thereafter other station forces were employed during the agent's former hours of work. It also appears that telegraphers' work was still required to be performed at these stations. Under the ebb and flow of work principle, established by the Third Division, N.R.A.B., the work performed by such other forces is ultimately the agent's work being performed by others to provide assistance to him. .

Under such circumstances it cannot be said that the work of the position of agent has disappeared or substantially diminished, so as to justify the elimination or combination of positions by the Carrier in the absence of agreement with the organization, under the interpretive principles established by the Third Division, N.R.A.B.

As the Third Division has consistently said it will not direct the re-establishment of positions but leave the future resolution of the problem to agreement by the parties or reassignment by the Carrier in accordance with the agreement or subsequent changes. This Board accordingly declines to direct a re-establishment of the positions abolished herein.

-3-


        Concerning the claims for compensation it appears that the responsibility of the Carrier is to make the affected employes whole for actual wage losses and any directly connected necessary expense, such as room rent and commuting expense at a distant work place. It is not responsible for damages for monetarily umneasurable results such as changes in rest days, reasonable changes in distance from home to work place or the purchase of a second automobile, because the agreement neither provides for nor contemplates the assessment of such unliquidated items of damage. The determination of actual monetary amounts is held in abeyance at this time, for resolution by the representatives of the parties on this Board.


AWARD: Claim sustained to the extent stated in the findings.

                SPECIAL BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT NO. 327


                /s/ Dudley E. Whiting

                DUDLEY E. WHITING, REFEREE


/s/ R. J. Woodman /s/ H. F. Wyatt
R. J. WOODMAN, Employe Member H. F.-WYATT, JR., Carrier Member
Philadelphia, Pa. October 7, 1960