CASE N0. 21
SSW FILE 47-313-8
SPECIAL BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT N0. 353
PARTIES) Transportation-Communication Employees Union
TO )
DISPUTE St. Louis Southwestern Railway Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
'Claim of the General Committee of The Order of Railroad
Telegraphers on the St. Louis Southwestern Railway, that:
1. Carrier violated the agreement between the parties when
it failed to properly compensate E. R. Ferguson for December 1, 1962.
2. Carrier shall be required to compensate E. R. Ferguson
in the amount of a day's pay (8 hours) at the rate of the-third shift
Clerk-Telegrapher position at Dallas, Texas, for December 1, 1962,
less amount already allowed."
OPINION OF BOARD:
Claimant was protecting the 11:55 P.M. - 7:55 A.M. -ClerkTelegrapher position at the Dallas, Texas Yard Office, due to the
regular assigned telegrapher being off work. Claimant protected
this vacancy Friday, November 30, 1962, and upon reporting for work
at 11:55 P.M. Saturday, December 1, found the regular assigned employs there to protect the position.
Claimant had been instructed to fill the position until
advised otherwise. The regular assigned employe sent a telegram
to the Chief Dispatcher at Pine Bluff, Arkansas, about noon
December 1, advising that he would protect his position that night.
For some reason Claimant was not contacted although the
regular employs sent the wire almost
12 hours
before the starting
time of the position. The regular employe was allowed to work and
Claimant was assigned to work the regular relief position at the
Dallas yard 7:55 A.M. to 3:55 P.M. both December 2 and 3.
r
- 2 - AWARD N0. 19
Claimant filed a claim for a 2 hour call and this was allowed
by Carrier. The General Chairman filed a claim for eight hours' pay
less any compensation already allowed. This claim was denied by
Carrier and progressed to this Board.
The issues in this case are similar to those in Award No. -3
S.B.A. 353. In that case we sustained the claim for a day's pay.
See also Third Division Award 13936 (Dorsey).
In this case Carrier had more than ample time to advise
Claimant and failed to do so. The fact Carrier found him a position
to fill the following day is no defense to this claim.
We will sustain the claim.
FINDINGS: That the agreement was violated.
AWARD: Claim sustained.
Don
J
Harr, hairrdan
.r,
D. A. Bobo, Employee Member M. L. Erwin, Carrier Member
Tyler, Texas
December 28, 1966