SPECIAL BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT N0. 353
AWARD N0. 23
CASE N0. 26
SSW FILE 47-493-2
PARTIES) Transportation-Communication
Employees Union
TO )
)
DISPUTE) St. Louis Southwestern Railway Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
Claim of the General Committee of the TranaportationCommunication Employees Union on the St. Louis Southwestern Railway
Lines, that:
'
1. Carrier violated the agreement between the parties when,
it failed and refused to properly compensate H. R. Lucas, Jr. for
services performed on June 26, 27, 28 and 29, 1964.
2. Carrier shall compensate H. R. Lucas, Jr. in the amount
of eight hours at the time and one-half rate on each of the dates
mentioned above.
OPINION OF BOARD:
On May 26, 1964, the f.irst shift clerk-telegrapher position
at "QN" Tyler, Texas was advertised for bid and Claimant was the
successful bidder. At the time Claimant was regularly assigned as
second shift clerk-telegrapher at Greenville, Texas. The hourly
rate of the Tyler position was $2.6228, the hourly rate at Greenville
was $2.5228. Claimant was assigned to the Tyler position by
Carrier's letter of June 9, 1964.
On June 22, 1964, the Chief Dispatcher wired'Claimant inquiring as to when he intended to protect his assigned position
at Tyler.
On June 24 Claimant replied as follows:
"D-1034. If agreeable with you would like to protect
Tyler job next Wednesday July 1st, as have my rent
paid at Greenville until then. Thanks."'
l . .
- 2 - AWARD NO. 23
Claimant's request was allowed and he remained at Greenville
through his work week ending June 29, 1964. He protected his
assignment at Tyler beginning July 1.
The Employes filed a claim alleging Carrier violated Article
13-1 of the agreement and claiming 4 days' pay at time and one-half
under Article 16-1.
These Articles read:
"Article 13
"13-1. Except as per Article 13-2 permanent vacancies
and permanent additional positions shall be bulletined
to all employees on the division; bulletin to show location, position, hours of service and rate of pay and
the senior employee covered by this agreement making
written application within ten (10) days from date of
bulletin, if competent, shall be assigned. The successful applicant shall be notified of his assignment within
twenty (20) days from date of bulletin. If transfer is
not made within thirty (30) days from date of bulletin
the employee shall be paid not less than assigned daily
earnings of position awarded, penalty beginning after
expiration of thirty (30) days from date bf bulletin.
Assignments shall be posted promptly by bulletin for
information of all employees on the division. An,.
agent at regular telegraph station to whom the duties
of telegraphing are assigned or withdrawn will not be
disturbed in his position by reason of such changed
duties. An employee to whom the duties of cashier are
assigned or withdrawn will not be disturbed, except
that proper adjustments in rate of pay will be made in
lane with similar positions on the division. Bulletins
will be numbered consecutively
commencing with
Number One,
January lst, each year and each vacancy or-new position
will be bulletined within five (5) days from date of
vacancy or creation.
"16-1. A regularly assigned employe who is taken off his
assignment to perform relief or emergency work at an
office or station other than the one to which assigned
will be compensated at the rate of time and one-half
the straight-time rate of the position filled, a~-ui=^-.
shall be paid actual necessary expenses while away-<`r
. from his home station."
,_~.
";:;ia
r~,? ,
,.,P~T~N ..
' * seh 353
- 3 - AWARD N0. 23
It is clear to this Board that Article 16-1 has no application
here. Article 13-1 provides a penalty where an employee is not
transferred within 30 days of date of bulletin. The Claimant was
entitled to be paid the higher rate beginning 30 days after date of
bulletin as set forth in Article 13-1.
We agree with the Employes' contention that voluntary action
by an individual
employe cannot
abrogate or nullify the provisions
of a collective bargaining agreement. However, both parties should
be concerned with the welfare of individual employes. In the
instant case Carrier acted at Claimant's request and in his own
best interest.
We will deny the claim.
FINDINGS: That the agreement was not violated.
AWARD: Claim denied.
'~GcCI-~- ~ ~ hh.~
Don J. Har ,Chairman
,~1~ ~~/Glu~r~/ n/
D. A. Bobo, Employee Member M. L. Erwin, Carrier Member
Tyler, Texas
December 28, 1966
0