SMCIAL BO= OF ADSU^JTLE' NT ITO. 355 CAR. FIIE : 2789
PARTIES: TM
ORDERp~1 Or
7~B
i~RAILROAD
TELEGRAPIEL'RS
CASE NO. 274
THE BALI IMOR AND OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY
AWARD IN DOCKET NO. 2?4
· STATEMENT 1, Carrier violates and continues to violate the
OF CLAIM: Agreemont when it requires a person not covered
by said Agreement to perform work of the agent
operator at Bowling Green, Ohio at a time when
the agent-operator is off duty.
2. Carrier shall compensate
R. bI.
Vannoy, agent-operator
at Bowling Green, in the amount of a minimum call
payment on each date this violation occurs beginning
with December 18, 1961.
F1ZWYNG$: We think that a portion of the work at Bowling
Green which Carrier contracted out cannot be held
to be work exclusive to the Telegrapher class.
However, the flagging of trains for passengers is
part
or
the duties of the agent-operator at this
one-man station.
Carrierzs reliance on our Award in Docket No. 99
is
of no help. There was no evidence there of any
flagging having been required. The evidence hero is
the contract between the Carrier and the contractor.
Accordingly a sustaining award is required on a call
basis.
A j7 A R D
Claims wined in accordance w~*th Findings.
i
"'"'-` war .. ync
Chairman
1-=
- . ~= E.
-Mitt
Employee uer Carrier Member
Dated at Baltimore,
Maryland
this 16th day o£ September, 1964,