SPECIAL BO1AM OP ADJUSTMEL'NT NO, 355 CAR. FILE: 2941
 COX. FILE: A-3731
 GR. DIV. BU-9223-33
 PARTIES: THE ORDER Or RAILROAD TEWGRAXMIRS CASE N0. 280
 e THE BALTIHORE AIM OliI0 RAILROAD COMPANY
 ACJARD IN DOCIOT NO. 280

 STATEMENT 1. Carrier violated the Agreement between the parties
 Oh' CLAIM: when, on July 9, 1962 it required or permitted an
 employee not covered by said Agreement to perform
 work during the ticket agent's assigned hours at
 Chillicothe, Ohio.
 2. Carrier shall compensate ticket agent R, 1% Barnhaxt
 in the amount of eight hours at the time and one-half
 rate for July 8, 1962.
 FINDINGS: This claimant is used on a 10:d0 and 11:34 A. M., call
 basis to cover the arrival of two trains on Sundays.
 On the date giving rise to this claim a third train
 which ordinarily arrives outside claimantqs assigned
 hours was late and arrived within his assigned 8:00
 5:00 workday hours. Scheduled for a 5:32 A.i7., ar
 rival it did not arrive until 8:45 A.PI4, Carrier
 used a ticket clerk, outside the agreement here ap
 plicable, to cover the arrival of the train.
 In our Award in Docket No: 233 we followed our Award
 in Docket No; 112 which held that "when Carrier ro
 quires that work be performed on the rest days of
 positions, the work must fall within the established
 time limits of the position or positions required to
 be worked."
 This record does not disclose when Carrier first
 became aware of the fact that Train No. 1 would be
 late. It shorts the Traincmster instructed the Ticket
 Clerk to protect it, and that clerk's assigned hours
 end at 5:30 A.r1. The train did not arrive until 3
 hours, 15 minutes later. Carrierts de:ense is that
 "the ticket clerk is regularly assigned to handle
 Train No. 1."
 As it turned out, Carrier required the handling of
 Train No. 1 within the assigned hours of Ticket Agent
 R. GJ. Barnhart, ar,A a sustaining award is required.
 A R D




          l ~L'l y


Employe ~"'~ " - - Carrion Member
 7)ated at Pa more, Maryland
 this 16th day of September, 1964.