PARTIES: THE ORDER OF RAILROAD TELEGRAPHERS
THE BALTIMORE AND OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY
AWARD IN DOCKET N0. 39
STATEMENT
OF CLAIM:










FINDINGS-

Two Two conversations are involved in this claim. The first, between the Flagman and Dispatcher, comes within our interpretation of permissible conversation.

The second conversation, in consequence of Dispatcher's request made in the conversation with the flagman and Harry Phillips, the conductor on an eastbound
mine run:'



This latter conversation is of the same character as that involved in Organization's Claim No. 1117, settled by Carrier's letter covering conference held thereon on August 15, 1957 (Docket No. 34, ORT Exhibit No. 2):

        "However, in one the conversations of April 25, 1957, a message

        was sent instructing the crew of train 95 on what to do on arrival x x".

        (Emphasis added)


That conversation, plus two others furnishing consist information were acknowledged by the Carrier to be contract violations, and the claims were allowed.

Consequently, we will sustain claim for the conversation involving Phillips and the Dispatcher. Claim for subsequent dates will not be allowed.

                        A WAR D


            Claim sustained to the extent indicated in findings.


/s/ Edward A. Lynch
Edward A. Lynch
/s/ B. N. Kinkead Chairman /s/ T. S. Woods
B. N. Kinkead Dissenting T. S. Woods
Employee Member Carrier Member

Dated at Baltimore, Md., this 20th day of February, 1962.