Parties: THE ORDER OF RAILROAD TELEGRAPHERS
THE BALTIMORE AND OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY

AWARD IN DOCKET N0. 87 STATEMENT OF CLAIM:





FINDINGS:

The "Interpretation to Article 34," upon which the Organization relies heavily, does apply where the contractor requires information by use of the telephone regarding location of trains, etc.,



This record shows that before this particular phase of the work had begun, the concrete pillars had been completed. It further shows - without contradiction from the Organization - that the



The Carrier says it sent its train service employees and an assistant Yardmaster to the scene



The protection of the contractor's employees and equipment was the responsibility of the contractor.

All his equipment and workmen were working "on the road or above the elevation of top of the previously constructed piers and so did not interfere with the movement of trains in any way, nor did the movement of trains interfere with their operation."

There thus being no need for the protection of the workmen and construction equipment on the part of the Carrier, there was no need for the Carrier to use telegraphers or telephones.




/s/ B. N. Kinkead, dissenting /s/ Edward A. Lynch /s/ T. S. Woods
B.N.Kinkead, Employee Member Edward A. Lynch T.S.Woods,Carrier Member
Chairman
Dated at Baltimore, Maryland,
this 20th day of February, 1962.