THE ORDER OF RAILROAD TELEGRAPHERS )
VS. )
NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD, EASTERN DISTRICT )
(except Boston and Albany Division) and )
NEW YORK DISTRICT )

STATEMENT OF CLAIM:





OPINION OF BOARD:

This claim is based on the contention that the Carrier failed to notify extra employee M. J. Crounse on March 12, 1960 that his assignment at Int.-7 was terminated on that date and that employee A. Pacifico would cover the position effective at 7:00 A. M. on March 13, 1960. The Carrier states that it called the claimant at his home at 11:30 A.M. on March 12, 1960 to notify him that the temporary vacancy he had held was being terminated and that Pacifico would cover the position beginning March 13. The Carrier further states that Claimant Crounse was not at home at the time of this call and a message containing the above information was therefore left with Claimant's housekeeper, The Carrier also says that this message was given in accordance with the practice that had been in effect for a considerable time as a means of contacting the claimant regarding work assignments.

While the claimant denies the Carrier's statement that a call to him was delivered by phone to his housekeeper during his absence from home, the record does not contain any denial of the receipt of this call by the housekeeper herself. In view of this state of the record, the claim must be dismissed.

Claim dismissed.
lsl Lloyd H. Bailer
Lloyd H. Bailer, Chairman
/s/ L. Faulds /s/ R. J. Woodman
L. Faulds, Carrier Member R. J. Woodman, Employe Member

June 25, 1963

September 9, 1963