5;%OTFF,RI-LCOD OF NkINTENA_NCE OF WAY aTMYFS

urr

aE U4CKkVANXA RAILtAY COMPANY













I~t DINCS:

On each of the claim dates? Clai_:lant, a carpenter he-por whose duties included operating the group's truck, worked his regular ass=Lment. __ leading carmenterr drove another truck on those dars to trcns_ort a._;zr.-° Llc~d carpenter and himsc=f, to inspection sites and the c?uesic= at '=>sue _,: vvinether or not clairrlnt should have teE_n called to berform -"hat war Ors ';:= Overtime basis. No additional circumstance or agrecLlent has been `7re86nted here that calls for a result at variance with the decision reaCn6C in r~ard 31.

:':e are not persuaded that carpenter or plumber heloers have 'CJne exclusive right to drive trucks for their gangs either by agree---:;--' or by ast practice and trill deny the claim.

Ai-A7RT s Claim denied.

Dated at flew York, N.Y., this 6th day of February; 1969.







                            r, _

                            _ . J, DunTYl--~grc`lm


                                Z/ Carroll


                            R. k. Carroll, Carrier =-~ei::ber