STATEMENT OF CLAIM:





























                                                SCSA 553


          4. On each date, in each instance subsequent to August 15,

      1960, that the Carrier permits or requires employes of . another class and.craft at Mr. Hatcher 's office 65 Market Street, San Francisco, California, to fill positions and, perform work belonging exclusively to the Telegraph class of employes, the Carrier shall be required to pay the senior,. qualified, idle, extra Telegrapher -or if no senior extra Telegrapher is available then the senior, Idle, regularly assigned Telegrapher at 'HUY General Telegraph Office, 610 South Main Street, Los Angeles, California, shall be paid a special call' or eight (8) hours at the overtime rate, or the applicable compensation provided for under the prevailing Agreement,


              NOTE: Request is made for a point check of the Carrier's records, in order to determine the evidence of the violations being required or permitted by the Carrier also in order to determine the proper claiman~s and the amount of compensation due each claimant."


OPINION OF BOARD: This is another Situation Report case. Here the Union charges the Carrier with violation of the Agreement on August 15, 1960 and subsequq;it dates by having clerks or other non-telegraphers in the Los Angeles Office telephone the daily situation report to a supervisor in the office of the General Superintendent of Transportation in San Francisco.
Prior to 1942 this report had been transmitted exclusively by telegraphers by telegraph or teletype. In 1960, Carrier discontinued the teletyped report and instructed that it be sent by mail, On September 15, 1960, the Union filed the present claim. Carrier contends that nontelegraphers have been telephoning this information since 1942, The Union denies that telegraphers had any knowledge of this prior to August 1960.
The facts of this case are almost identical with those in Dockets 28 and 31, except that the report was-sent from a different office. There is no basis for a different ruling. Therefore, for the reasons expressed in Awards 28 and 31, we hold that the work of transmitting these reports belonged to telegraphers and that.Carrier violated the Agreement.

                              -2-

                                              S~3~ 553 Au-3d 31


                            AWARD


The claim is sustained for one call payment for each of the telegraphers named in the claim. The continuing part of the claim is deni®d. Carrier is directed to restore the work of transmitting the information in this report to telegraphers.

                SPECIAL BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT N0. 553


                      Roy R. Say, Chairmen


~ vv,~ w . v . v (per r
.. AD , Hobo, Employe Mem er L. W. Sloany Carrier Member

Ban Francisool California
September 29 1965

-3-