SPECIAL BOARD OF ~DJUSTPo^NT N0. 570


                ESTABLISHED Ui1DER


            AGRFT~^fT OF SEFTEidHRR 25, 1064


            Chicago, Illinois - J L)N~F ~.4 /9~-a


PARTIES International Brotke rhood of Electrical T,lorkers
 2'0 System Federation No. 1, Railway Zmployes' Department (AFL-CIO)
 DISP~2 E:
 v.
 Consolidated Rail Corporation

 STATY_·M,?;T 1. That the Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conrail)
 0'.·' violated the Controlling Agreement of System Federation
 CI_SIli: ?:o. 54, the Mediation Agreement of September 25, 1964,
            Article III Sections 1, 2, and 3 when it improperly con

            tracted out the work of the electrical craft. as out

            lined in Rule 11.4. to an outside concern; the work to

            be done at Avon Yard in Indiana.


            2. Theta accordingly, the Carrier be ordered to compensate Electricians C. Filburn man. X047425, 'rl. Liesure :dap. ~,~81608~ and R. Poole Man. =750111 the amount of money that they could have earned had they not been deprived of their contractual rights to perform the work granted to the outside contractor.


FINDINGS: Carrier notified the general chairman that it intended to
 subcontract the construction of a 36' & 24' addition to the
 diesel house at Avon '_ard, Indiana. The total cost of labor construction
 was $35,000, with an estimated :;11,.000 for installation of necessary
 lighting. Pet ~ioner alleges that this contracting out was in violation
 of the September 25, 191:4 v8reement. Carrier alleles thaC petitioner's
 claim has filed in an untimely manncr and that it is not ceauired to
 piecemeal a conztruction contract of the type involved here.
 s.B.A. ,',`570
 AFIARD iio. 489 Page 2.
 CASE No. 573

 In Award No. 488, this Board addressed the identical issue involving the same carrier and the same petitioner. .·1e see no reason to again restate our position in this ward. Our decisions on timeliness and on the piecemeal issue apply to this case, just as they did in Award No. 488.

 This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified above, hereby orders that an award favorable to the petitioner should not be made The claim is disposed of as set forth in the foregoing award.

 AKARD: Claim denied.

          Adopted at Chicago, Illinois -~V ~SL~D


            7Z~iD11 I 0 :~:.w li1 .. ai:i~i.i~ i·w.:·L7'


    :. ' - .i a 'j ,


CARRIER :·LC,_·'~E? l~OR .` : `La.R
              t

    ·S


                                            i

CAr?itLR :·fc:~·`~b:~t iiO~ 2·1ut%R
 f
 ~~1aL~ '.a:-i8-VR R r1.G:·uC