S.B.A. No.
570
Award No.
58
Case No.
81
Special Board of Adjustment No.
570
Established Under
Agreement of September
25, 1964
Chicago, Illinois -
PARTIES System Federation No.
95
_TO Railway Employes' Department
DISPUTE: A.F.L. - C.I.O. - Electricians
and
Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company
STATEMENT 1. That the Carrier violated the provisions of Article II of
OF CLAIM: the Mediation Agreement of September
25, 1964,
when it
improperly subcontracted to Interstate United Corporation
the servicing of vending machines in dining cars of the
Nebraska Zephyrs, train Nos. 11 and
12.
2. That accordingly the Carrier be ordered to compensate the
following electricians on the basis of the number of hours
of work of the Electricians' craft, performed by the Inter
state United Corporation on vending machines during the month
of May and June,
1966.
R. A. Kalis - Electrician employed at Chicago, Illinois.
D. S. Hill -Electrician employed at Aurora, Illinois.
M. Himburger - Electrician employed at Omaha, Nebraska.
Lyle Parrish - Electrician employed at Galesburg, Illinois.
L. J. Timpsett - Electrician employed at Lincoln, Nebraska.
FINDINGS: The first issue is Carrier's contention that "the claim was not
filed in accordance with the time limit agreed upon
by
the
parties," and particularly the sixty-day time limit under
rule 30(a) for the claim of violation, and the further sixty-day time limit
thereafter for the wage claim under the following provision of the Memorandum
of Understanding of January
7, 1965,
namely:
"However, if there should be any claims filed for wage loss on
behalf of a named claimant arising out of an alleged violation
of Article II - subcontracting (see Section
14
of Article VI),
such claims for wage loss should be filed promptly and within
60
days of the filing, of the alleged violation of Article II -
sub-contracting, with the same Carrier Officer as to whom such
violation of Article II was directed by the General Chairman
of the craft of crafts involved, or his representative."
The alleged violations occurred on February 28,
1966.
On
May 9, 1966,
the General Chairman wrote the Staff Officer saying:
"# * s
I believe it comes under the provisions of the Agreement of September 25,
1964".
The wage claim was sent to the Staff Officer on July 18,
1966,
and was received
by him on July 20. ,
Assuming that the General chairman's letter of May
9, 1966,
constituted a claim of violation, it is apparent that it was not within sixty
days after February 28,
1966;
it is also apparent that the wage claim sent on
July 18,
1966,
and delivered on July 20, was not within sixty days after the
claim of violation. However, the record indicates that all of the parties' discussion upon the property was on the merits, and that these ,jurisdictional points
were not raised. They were therefore waived and now come too late. The record
does not show when the dispute was brought to this Board by notice, or when the
parties' submissions were filed, and no question is raised whether those actions
were in time. We shall therefore proceed to examine the claim on its merits.
After the making of necessary changes in each dining car, including the installation by electricians in Carrier's Car Shops at Aurora of two
transformers, an air compressor and additional wiring and circuits, the vending
machines were installed on lease from the Interstate United Corporation, which
services them in all respects, including the supplying of food, the collection
of money and their maintenance in operation. They are mechanical, but the pouer
end heat is supplied by electricity. The Carrier has no authority over nor control of their operation, as is true of the other vending machines installed on
its property. Any vending machine which the servicemen are unable to keep in
operation is removed for repairs by the Interstate United Corporation, which installs another in its place. The Carrier's electricians service the additional
equipment and wiring installed for their operation, as in the case of other
electrical equipment and wiring on the cars.
The Employes state in their submission:
"These machines replaced the following electrical equipment in
each diner:
"l. The electric dishwasher switch and associated wiring.
"2. The electric coffee urns and associated wiring.
"3. The electric toasters and associated wiring.
"4.
The electric exhaust fans, switches, and
associated wiring.
"5.
The electric lights, switches and associated
wiring in reefers.
"All of the replaced equipment was formerly serviced and maintained by carrier electricians. The vending machines that replaced the mentioned electrical equipment are being serviced
and maintained by employes of an outside firm, namely Interstate United Corporation. The carrier has alleged that since
the machines require food stocking.and coin collecting, it is
5&l-1
6_7D
-AlLcI40
SO
- 3 -
necessary for the vending machine company to also service
the machines. The organization has insisted that the elec
trical work of servicing and. maintaining the vending machines
rightfully belongs to Carrier electricians but has not claimed
the food stocking or coin collecting work.
r s $ xtt
"The electrical craft, as part of the recognized electrical
work, maintain and service the air conditioning, coolers and
refrigeration of the Carrier's fleet of passenger and dining
cars and have satisfactorily performed this work for many
years. Also have maintained, serviced, and repaired equipment that utilized electricity to heat water, such as the
coffee urns that were removed from the diners on the Nebraska
Zephyrs and are completely competent and capable of maintaining and repairing the electrical equipment contained in the
vending machines."
The equipment mentioned in their submission as replaced by the
vending machines has not been removed from the cars, but is not being used.
Article II of the Mediation Agreement of September 25, 1964
provides:
"The work set forth in the classification of work rules of the
crafts parties to this agreement will not be contracted except
in accordance with the provisions of Sections 1 through 4 of
this Article II."
Rules
7
and
70
(a) of the current Agreement provide as follows:
"Rule
7.
The maintenance of electrical and power lines in and
around the shops and buildings, the maintenance of motors and
other electrical equipment, all electrical work on manufactured
or repaired material."
~t * t
~e
"Rule
7U
(a). Electricians' work shall consist of maintaining,
repairing, rebuilding, inspecting and installing the electric
wiring of all generators, switchboards, meters, motors and controls, rheostats and controls, motor generators, electric headlights, and headlight generators, electric welding machines,
storage batteries, axle lighting equip=ent, and electric
lighting fixtures; winding armatures, fields, magnet coils,
rotors, transformers and starting compensators; inside and
outside wiring at shops, buildings, yards and on structures,
and all conduits work in connection therewith, including
steam and electric locomotives, passenger trains, motor cars,
electric tractors and trucks. Operators of electric cranes of
40-ton capacity and over and all other work generally recognized
as electricians' work."
· 515/o-
5-70 - ,a-wo
s8
As these rules do not mention the servicing of vending r=chines,
the question presented is rhether such irork is generally reco,-sized
as
electriciens's work. As noted above, it includes the supplying of food, the h<,_ndLing
of money and such maintenence and repairs to keep them in operation as the servicemen are able to perform. This apparently involves sore attention to motors
and heating elements contained in the vending machines. The question is whether
this work on equipment belonging to another co_·_pany, and maintained by it and
not by the Carrier, is generally recognized as electricians' work under the
Agreement.
The Employes' submission sets forth as exhibits the following
letters:
Exhibit E, a letter from Carrier's Staff Officer, E. J. Conlin,
to the General Chairman, dated July 12,
1966,
in which he wrote:
"You mentioned some electrical applicances that had formerly
been in this car, such as an electric dishwasher, toaster
etc. and advanced a contention that the vending machines had
replaced these appliances. Since the vending machines have
been installed, the dishes have been eliminated and that
function is not performed on the cars at all. The same thing
is true of the other appliances you mentioned.
"I also advised you that the additional wiring that was installed in these cars by CB-Q electricians at the Aurora Shops,
and the maintenance on this additions.? wiring necesszry for a
vending machine operation, would more than offset the infrequent
repairs made to these electrical appliances. The craft you
represent have gained considerable work due to the conversion
of these cars to a vending machine operation.
"You asked that the Carrier turn over to CB&Q electricians
the maintenance of the vending machines themselves. I advised
you this could not be done, since we do not own these vending
machines. They are the property of the vending machine company,
Interstate United Corporation, and that company maintains them.
This is the same as all of the vending machines on this property,
including those in shop craft facilities. We have never attempted
to maintain vending machines with our o:m employes, nor do other
corporations. One of the reasons why vending "Machine companies
do this themselves is that the stocking of the machines, the
collection of coins and maintaining the machine is all done by
the same person. CB?Q electricians could not stock the machines
or collect the coins."
Exhibit G, a letter .from the Federation's Secretary-Treasurer
to Mr. Conlin, dated November
5, 1966,
in which he wrote:
"Please refer to previous correspondence regarding the installation
of vending m--chines on the property.
. . . , - 5 - s
af
s7o -.e~-~ sg
"When this Company was given the contract it was with the
assurrance that they would efficiently maintain and supply
them. This is what you passed along to us, but it certainly
is not working out that way.
"There has been no place on the property where we have not
received complaints. The last place handled in writing was
at Galesburg and we have received vigorous protests again
from both the roundhouse and repair tracks. They state that
they have delapidated old machines which are inoperative
over half the time and not ever properly maintained or
supplied.
"We are now also receiving many complaints from the Clyde
diesel shop as follows: 'They are either broke down half
the time, will not return the proper change or short change
you on a cup of coffee or soda.'
"We have had similar complaints from West Burlington and
Aurora shops recently.
"This Federation would appreciate your investigation and
action to determine if this Vending Company is really
sincere in wanting these, concessions and if not we request
that some other company or companies be considered. Please
advise." (Emphasis added)
Exhibit H, a letter dated November
8, 1966,
in which Mr.
Conlin replied:
"I will have these complaints investigated with the Interstate United Corporation and advise you as soon as possible."
Exhibit I, a letter dated December
7,'1966,
in which Mr.
Conlin reported further:
"Under date of November
29, 1966
Interstate United advised us
that all of the conditions set forth in your letter of
November 5th had been investigated. and corrected. At Galesburg, some of the equipment was replaced; at West Burlington,
Aurora and Clyde, increased supervision has resulted in improved service.
"I am sure that Interstate United is doing its best to service
and maintain these vending machines in a satisfactory manner.
I sincerely hope that you will find a correction has been
made at these points listed, and if any more complaints are
received, please send them to me promptly."
This correspondence shows that the maintenance of leased vending
machines on the property is not generally recognized, or even clained by the
. . . . _ _ 5Qf1-~o - /e-W
n 5-8
organization, as electricians' work, and the fact that the vending machines in
question may supersede equipment formerly serviced by them does not bring them
within the classification of work rules.
A W A R D'
Claim denied.
7!
Adopted at Chicago, Illinois -
Neutral Yle=ber
z _
/i r
Carrier Members ·Employe Me=:bers