S~ECIAL BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT N0. 591`0R.DIV.:. i'3626
THE ORDER OF RAILROAD TELEGRAPHERS

 VS.

 READING COMPANY

 STATEMENT
 OF CLAIM: "Claim of the General Committee of The Order'of Railroad
 Telegraphers on the Reading Company that:

 Claim No. L,

 l.. Carrier violated the partieat Agreement by requiring .
 or permitting an employe not covered thereby to handle
 a train order at Linfieid, Pennsylvania, on, August 9,. 1961.
2, Carrier shall be required to compensate J. Dombroskie,
 senior idle extra employe, a. day's pay CS hours).

 CLAIM No. 2
1. Carrier violated the parties' Agreement.by requiring
 or permitting an employe not covered,thereby to handle
 a train order at Cromby, Pennsylvania, on August 10, 1961.

 2, Carrier shall be required to compensate. W. R. Gracely,
 senior idle extra employee a dayT's pay (8 hours),"

 FINDINGS: This docket involves the delivery of train orders to a
 Speno Cleaner train by telephone at points where no operaCors
 are employed. The situation-is like that in Docket:No.°~3,v'so
 our Award No, 3-governs diaposition'of these c),aims, `y.
 AWARD: Claims denied. ,

 SPECIAL BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT N0. 591

 /s/ John T. Finnegan JOHN T. FINNEGAN Dissenting Organization Member;

 PHILADELPHIA,, PA.,

 IAN 10 1966
DUDLE E~HITI G,, CHAIRMAN

 /s/ V. W. Bigelow.'

 V. W. BIGELOW
 Carrier Member''