w
Award No. 3
Docket No. 3
GR. DIV.: 3303
SPECIAL BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT N0. 591
THE ORDER OF RAILROAD TELEGRAPHERS
VS.
READING COMPANY
STATEMENT "Claim of the General Committee of The Order of Railroad Telegraphers on
OF CLAIM: the Reading Company, that:
1. Carrier violated the agreement between the parties when on June 5,
6, 7, 8, and 9, 1960, it required or permitted employes not.covered by the agreement to handle (receive, copy and deliver) train
orders at Fairhill Junction, Pa.
2. Carrier shall compensate an extra telegrapher in the amount of a
day's pay for each shift on each date the violations occurred; J. J.
Moyer on the first shift, G. E. Strelitz on the second shift, and
J. W. Milnes, Jr., on the third shift, (5 days each)."
FINDINGS: Water and debris from a fire adjacent to the Richmond
Branch within
Philadelphia yard and switching limits caused some interference, with
operations thereon. Train orders were issued through the towerman at
NI to train crews by telephone at Fairhill Junction,.the starting point
of the Richmond Branch. There has never been a telegrapher assigned
to Fairhill Junction.
It is conceded that Article 34, the train order rule, is not appli
cable as no telegrapher was assigned at the point involved. Under those
circumstances the use of the telephone to deliver the train order to the
train crew is not a substitute for work formerly performed by telegraph.
Rather it is a substitute for messenger service, a member of the train
crew walking to the telegraph office, or the telegrapher walking to the
train, 'such as was necessary before the use of wayside telephones. Under
these circumstances the claim is not sustainable.
AWARD: Claim denied.
SPECIAL BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT N0. 591
/s/ Dudle E, Wnitin
Dudley E. Whiting, CFisman
Ls/
John T. Finnegan
Ls/
V. W. Bigelow
JOHN T. FINNEGAN Dissenting V. W. BIGELOW
Organization Member Carrier Member
PHILADELPHIA, PA.
January 11, 1966.