PARTIES: Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees
 TO
 DISPUTE: Chicago and North Western Transportation Company





2. Claimant Perkins shall have discipline removed from his
 record and be compensated for all time lost in accordance
 with Rule 19 (d).
 FINDINGS:
 Claimant A. Perkins was employed as a section foreman at the
 Carrier's Proviso Yard.
 On December 1, 1988, Carrier notified the Claimant of the
 following charge:
 Your responsibility for not reporting for your assignment at your starting time on November 28, 1988. After one postponement, the hearing was held on December 12, 1988; and on December 15, 1988, the Carrier notified the Claimant that he had been found guilty of the charge and was assessed discipline of a tenday suspension commencing December 19, 1988. This Board has reviewed the evidence and testimony in this case, and we find that there is sufficient evidence in the record to support the finding that the Claimant was guilty of being late for duty on November 28, 1988. He made no attempt to advise the Carrier of the reasons for his late reporting. Once this Board has determined that there is sufficient evidence in the record to support the guilty finding, we next turn our attention to
 the type of discipline imposed. This Board will not set aside a Carrier's imposition of discipline unless we find its action to have been unreasonable, arbitrary, or capricious.
 In the case at hand, the record reveals that the Claimant has received several warnings for attendance and that he had recently been suspended for five (5) days for a similar offense. Given that disciplinary history, this Board cannot find that the ten (10) day suspension issued by the Carrier was unreasonable, arbitrary, or capricious. Therefore, the claim must be denied. AWARD:
Claim denied.

Date: /~/ 7~`U

 PETER R. MEY
 Neutral Memur