BEFORE SPECIAL BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT NO. 924
BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYEES
and
CHICAGO & NORTH WESTERN TRANSPORTATION COMPANY
Case No. 209
Award No.
191
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the
Brotherhood that:
1. The dismissal of Machine Operator C. H. Gildea for
conduct unbecoming an employee during off duty
hours was without just and sufficient cause, based
on an unproven charge, capricious and excessive
(Organization File 4LF-2473D; Carrier File 81-9265).
2. Machine Operator C. H. Gildea shall now be allowed
the remedy provided in RUle 19(d).
FINDINGS:
The Claimant, who was on assignment as a Machine Operator on
a CAT-09 surfacing gang, was notified by the Carrier to appear
for an investigation to determine whether he was guilty of using
"profanities, obscenities and sexually harassing comments to the
night auditor" while lodged at the Holiday Inn at Council Bluffs,
Iowa on the evening of November 19 and the morning of November
20, 1991. The Claimant testified that he merely approached the
front desk on the night in question and asked for a wake up call
and joked around with the night auditor. He denied ever making
any kind of disturbance.
Basing its opinion on statements and testimony from the
night auditor, the Carrier found the Claimant guilty and
subsequently, dismissed him from service.
The parties being unable to resolve the issue, this matter
comes before this Board.
This Board has reviewed the evidence and testimony in this
case and we find that there is sufficient evidence in the record
to support the guilty finding. The record is clear that the
claimant engaged in the conduct unbecoming an employee at the
hotel at which he was lodged on November 19, 1991.
Once this Board has determined that there is sufficient
evidence in the record to support the guilty findings, we next
turn our attention to the type of discipline imposed. This
Board will not set aside a Carrier's imposition of discipline
unless we find its action to have been unreasonable, arbitrary,
or capricious.
Given the lengthy seniority of this Claimant, we find that
he should be reinstated on a leniency basis but without backpay.
Because the record in clear that he was under the influence of
alcohol on the evening in question, we order that his
reinstatement be pursuant to the Carrier's Alcohol and Drug Use
Policy and that he be required to comply with the requirements
contained therein.
AWARD:
Claim sustained in part.Claimant shall be reinstated on a
leniency basis but without backpay. He shall be required to
comply with the carrier' o of and ug Use Policy.
P TER R. EYER
eutral M m e
rier M mber O ganization M em r
Dated: