SPECIAL BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT N0. 924'
Award No. 2
Docket No. 2
PARTIES
L
B~rotherhood-of Maintenance of Way Employes
TO- t.
DISPUTE : Chicago and North Western Transportation Company
STATEMENT OF
CLAIM-::
"Claim of`th8 System Committee of the Brotherhood
thatx
(1)' The dismissal of L. X. Ulery for alleged`violation.,of
Rule°,G and Rule G addition was without just and sufficient
cause and excessive: (Organization File 4A-3214: CarrierFile-,D-11-3-3671,'.
(`2). Claimant L. 8. Ulery shall be reinstated with seniority
and all other rights unimpaired: and compensated for all,
wage loss suffered."
FINDINGS:
This Board:; upon the-whole record and all the evidence, finds
andholds that the employes and the Carrier involved, are-respectively
employes and Carrier within the meaning-of the Railway Labor Act, as
amended, and that the Shard has jurisdiction over the dispute herein.
Claimant was employed as a trackman in Tie Gang
713,
which
was to begin work at Denison,-Iowa, on July 26, 198. On that date -
a drug search of employes reporting for duty was conducted by Denison
Police Department representatives, a specially trained Police dog, and
Carrier's Special Agents.
In a search of claimant's vehicle,. whiile on Company property
on the date involved; Carrier's Special Agents allegedly found marijuana
and related paraphernalia. The Carrier describes the substances found
as "50 to 70 marijuana seeds in·the ashtray, a film cannister containing-marijuana, and a flat meal box_containingrvarious paraphernalia
usedfor the consumption of marijuana." Claimant was notified to report for investigation, to be conducted on August 4, 1982, on the
charge:
"Ybur:-responsibility in connection with violation of
Rule G and Rule G·Addition while om.duty at Denison, Iowa
on July 26, 1982."
The investigation was conducted as scheduled, on August 4, 1982,
and a copy of the transcript has been made a part of the record. We
find that the investigation was conducted in a fair and impartial manneir.
Carrier's Rule Grand Rule G' Addition, referred to in the
letter of charge, read:
s6 A- 5'--LY
Award INo. 2
Docket`Nb.2
" Page 2.
RULE G:-.
"The use of alcoholic beverages or narcotics bym7
employes subject to duty is prohibited. Being under
the influence of alcoholic beverages or narcotics while
on duty or on-Company property is prohibited. The use
or possession of alcoholic beverages or narcotics while
on,-duty or on Company property is prohibited."
RULE G': (ADDITION):,
"Except as otherwise provided below, employes are
prohibited from--reporting for duty or being on duty or
onrcompany property while under the influence of, orhaving inr~their possession while on duty or oir company
property; (1) any drug-the possession of which is prohibited
by law; (2). any drug belonging to the generic categories
of. narcotics, depressants, stimulants, tranquilizers,
hallucinogdns, or anti-depressants;
(3)
any drug assigned
a registration number by the Federal Bureau of Narcotics
and Dangerous-Drugs not included in category (2); or (4);
any liquid-containing alcohol.
"=t is permissible for an employe to take and use a
drug or medication coming within-categories (1), (2),
(3)
and
(4)"
above as medication for treatment of chronic health
problems or temporary illness provided that when medication
is prescribed by a licensed medical doctor the employe obtains from the doctor a written statement (which upon request, grill be submitted by the employe to lids supervisor)certifying that in the doctor's opinion the medication
prescribed does not adversely affect the employe's
ability to safely perform his duties with the company."
In the investigation substantial evidence was adduced by the
Carrier in support of the charge against claimant. The car involved
was on Company property. The.search revealed that it did contain the
marijuana seeds,and related'parapharnelia as described by the Carrier.
The claimant was in control of the car containing the marijuana and
related paraphernalia. Zt can properly be held, therefore, that'
claimant was in possession of the marijuana and related paraphernalia
on Company property in violation of the rules.
As has been stated many times, the use or possession of drugs
is considered a serious offense in the railroad industry, usually resulting in dismissal.
There is no proper,-basis for the Board to interfere with the
discipline imposed by the Carrier. The Hoard has no authority to
SQ /d- 9~p `/
Award No. 2
Docket.No.2
Page 3
consider issues concerning the application of Federal Laws or
Constitutional provisions.
AWARD
'
Maim denied':
~e~4~
6~y
Wrier Membez^-
Chairman, Neutral Memberr
Date.-- yt6,j-.
z. S)
I `l g
3
Labor Mem er-.