SPECIAL
BOARD CF ADJUSTMENT NO. 924.
PARTIES:: Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employee
i0 :
DISPUTE: Chicago and North Western Transportation Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhoodthnt:
(1) The tPn (10) day suspension and loss of foreman and
a.~sistsnt foreman seniority rights pasessed J. 3.
Meggison for allegedly being absent without proper
authority for one (1) day was without just and
sufficient cause. (Organization File 7D-3192; Carrier
File -D-11-19-84).
(2) Foreman J. S. Meggison shall now be allowed the remedy
prescribed in Rule 19(d).
FINDINGS: This Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence. finds
and holds that the employee and the Carrier involved, are respectively
employes and Carrier within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act. as
amended, and that the Board has jurisdiction over the dispute herein.
The claimant herein is the same as involved in Docket No.
26. Award No. 22. He was employed as a track foreman on Carrier's
Twin Cities Divts?on, headquartered at Itasca, Wisconsin, with assigned hours 7:30 A.M. to 4:00 P.M., Monday through rriday. On
July 20, T982. claimant was notified to a~tnnd fcrmal investigation
scheduled for 2:00 P.M., July 2R, 1982, on the charge:
"Your responsibility for absenting yourself from duty
without proper authority on July 13, 1982 while assigned
as Track Foreman
Pt
Itas^a, Wisconsin."
The investigation was rescheduled for August 12, 1982,
a transcript of which has been made a pert of the record, following which claimant was as,~essed a ten-day suspension and disqualified as a Foreman and an Assistant Foreman.
There Is no disoute that claimant did not protect his
assignment on July 13. 1987. In the hearing. or investigation, it
was developed thpt claimant called another foreman about 4:O0
A.M., on the date involved and stated that he cold not be st wcrk
that day because of trouble he wa_s hevinp with his automobile;
the foremen to ·vyhom he talked told him (claimant) thrt he should
contpct one of his supervisors to obtain proper authority. Claimant
56A-(7a 5'
Award No. 23
Docket No. 27
then contacted the third shift yardmapter and reauested thrt a
message be relayed to his supervisor in the morning. Rule 14
of Carrier's General Regulations and Safety Rules provides:
"Employees must report for duty at the designated
time and place. They must be alert, attentive and
devote themselves exclusively to the Company's service
while on duty. They must not absent themselves from
duty, exchange duties with or substitute others in
their place, without proper authority."
The claimant no doubt knew, or should haves known, th.7t
"proper authority" referred to in Rule 14, was the Hoadmaster or
Aswistsnt Roadmaster.
It was also developed that claimant instructed the employe who prepared the work reuort for July 13, 1982, to show
him (claimant) as on vacation on the dry involved. it was established, however. thmt a vacation day was not avthorized by
anyone in authority, which is the general practice when vacations
are arranged. There was also evidence that July 13, 1982, w_s
the first full day of absence by claimant for a period of about
ten months.
Discipline aRalnst claimant for his actions on
.:'Ely
13,
1992, was warranted; however, his permanent diseualification as
a foreman and assistant foreman, was excea-ive. he will award
that his seniority in those classtfications be restored within
thirty days from the date of this award, but we will deny all
monetary features of the claim. The claimant should understant,
however, that the Board eonRidprs the manner in v=hick he handled
the vacation matter as a serious offense, and that further such
infractions on
his
part will receive short shrift by ail concerned.
A ld A R D
:.lain sustained to the extent indicate:? in Findings.
ORDER
The Carrier is direetp to comply with this Award within
thirty daps hereof.
i
Chatrman, Ueutr=1 Memtier,
Car i r iiefitber Labor Member
Date Sr~`