SPECIAL BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT'N0. 924
AtTTard No. 4'
PARTIES:: Erotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Docket No. 4
TD- t.
DISPUTE:. Chicago and North Western Transportation Company







FINDINGS-:

The Board, upon the whole record'and all the evidence, finds and holds that the employes and the Carrier involved, are respectively employes and Carrier within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as amended, and: that the Board has jurisdiction over the dispute herein.

Claimant'-was employed as a trackman orr.Carrier's Tie Gang ?13. On July 26, 1982, a thug search was conducted at Denison, Iowa, involving the tie gangs working-i;rthat area. -The search was made by Carrier°s Special Agents and membermof the aenison!-P.olice Department, withf,.a specially trained Police dog.

A search made of claimants personal vehicle, which was parked'on a public street in the vicinity of the-depot; revealed some marijuana and marijuana seeds, Claimant was arrested; and removed from Carrier's service. He was charged on. July 28, 1982, with investigation scheduled'for August 4, 1982, with:,




The investigation was conducted as scheduled, and a copy of the transcript has been made a part of the record. A review or the transcript`shows that the investigation was conducted in a fairand impartial manner.

Rule 7 of Carrier's General Regulations and Safety Rules reads::



Award No. 4
- Do~ ~g_ o. 4'

There was substantial evidence adduced at the investigation that the claimant did have marijuana and marijuana seeds in his personal vehicle. It was also established in the investigation that the Denison, Iowa, rrewspaperr reported claimant's arrest` on the drug charge and identified-him as an employe of the Chicago and North Western^.firansportation Company. We find. therefore,. that claimant's actions on July 26, 1982, did bring discredit to the Carrier. Discipline was warranted'and the forty-five (45) days suspension assessWclaimant was not arbitrary, capricious,or unreasonable: The fact that claimant was acquitted'by civil authorities of the charges arising from his arrest has no bearing on Csrriergs right to impose discipline. Many amrards of the National Railroad Adjust= ment`Board have adhered to the principle that a C'arrier's right to discipline an employe is unrelated to the actions of criminal orr civil courts.

                          A W A H D'

                        Claim denied. airman, Neutral Member'


    rier MemiSer: Labor Member.-


DATE::-. ~~ t