SPECIAL BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT N0. 924

PABTIESs Brotherhood -)Of Maintenance of Way Employes
TO s
DISPUTE: Chicago and North Western Transportation Company










Award No. 46
'Docket-No- 56

This Beard, upon-the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds that the employes and the Carrier involved, are respectively employes Qnd Carrier within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as amended, and that the 8'oard has jurisdiction over the dispute herein.

Claimant,, formerly employed by the Carrier as a ttackmsan, with about six years of service, was instructed on January 25. 1984, to appear for a hearing scheduled for 9·30 A.M., February 1, 190, on the charrre:~




but at a later hour. Claimant was present and represented""

A copy of the'transcript of the hearing has heen.made a part of the record*

In the hearing it was developed.thAt on claimant'a employment application, completed on September 14, 1978, claimant denied of ever being convicted of a felony or misdemeanor. In the hearing there was substantial evidence that claimant had been.convicted'of at least one felony and several misdemeanors prior to his application, but he failed to disclose such facts

to the Carrier. The Carrier-states that if it had

had knowledge



Of claimant's convictions, he would not ha ve been employed:.
C`laimant's application, a copy of which was made a part of the
hearing, states::.

      - "I-understand that any false statement, or snswerr

      - aantainea herein will tie grounds for immediate dismissal from the C&NW Transportation Cb."


It wp_s developed` that claimant was on probation as a result of a felony conviction at the time he signed the application for employment form. Also, claimant's criminal record showed vartous other law violations.. .

Numerous awards have been issued by.the Divisions of the National H'aLilroad Adjustment ffoard~upholding the dismissal of employes for falsification of apalications for employment, regardless of the time following the date of the aDDlication and when the falsification is discovered. Further; we note that claimant's prior discipline record while in C'Rrrier's service was fpr from satisfactory. There is no proper basis for disturbing the discipline imposed by the Carrier.

                      A W A A D


      Claim denied.


                  aA~i

                  Chairman, Neutral Member-


                        .~~

                                                  ~_~-


Wrier Member- Labor Me

Dijted: