' SPECIAL ADJUSTMENT BOARD NO. 947
Claimant - D. D. Ellington
Award No. 77
Case No. 77
PARTIES
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
TO and
DISPUTE
Southern Pacific Transportation Company (Western
Lines)
STATEMENT
That the Carrier's decision to suspend
OF CLAIM Claimant from its service for a period of ten
(10) working days was excessive, unduly harsh
and in abuse of discretion, and in violation
of the terms and provisions of the current
Collective Bargaining Agreement.
That because of the Carrier's failure to prove
and support the charges by introduction of
substantial bona fide evidence, that Carrier
now be required to compensate Claimant for any
and all loss of earnings suffered, and that
the charges be removed from his record.
FINDINGS
Upon reviewing the record, as submitted, the Board finds
that the Parties herein are Carrier and Employes within the
meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as amended, and that this
Special Board of Adjustment is duly constituted and has
jurisdiction of the Parties and the subject matter; with this
arbitrator being sole signatory.
The Claimant, a crane operator, was assigned to unload rail
near Little Mountain, Utah on March 24, 1988. While moving his
crane backwards into position, he simultaneously raised the boom
1
J
of the crane and hit electrical wiring. As a result of this
accident, he was charged with the possible violation of portions
of Rules K, 607, and 622 of the Rules and Regulations Governing
Maintenance of Way Employes and Rule 3 of the Rules and
Regulations for the Safe Operation and Care of Work Equipment.
The rules cited read:
Rule K, Paragraph 3:
Employes must inform themselves as to the
location of structures of obstructions where
clearances are close.
Rule 607:
Conduct: Employes must not be careless of
the safety of themselves or others . . . .
Rule 622:
Safety Rules: Employes must have a copy, be
conversant with and comply with safety rules
issued in separate book or other form.
Rule 3:
Equipment shall not be operated in a manner
to endanger life, limb or property.
A) Warning signs reading, "Unlawful to
operate this equipment within 10 feet of
high voltage lines of 50,000 volts or less"
shall be posted and maintained in plain view
of the operator and a driver. Also, warning
sign reading, "Unlawful to operate this
equipment within 10 feet of high voltage
lines of 50,000 volts or less shall be
located on each side of the boom on all -
automotive, track work, and shop equipment
which is equipped with boom type work
devices, regardless of assignment.
Following the investigation the Claimant received a letter
dated April 29, 1988, advising him he was suspended for a period
of ten (10) working days for violating the above mentioned
2
rules.
The Board believes the Claimant's actions in this case are
simply inexcusable. He failed to perform the relatively simple
task of making sure there was clearance before he moved his
equipment into position. His failure in this respect cannot be
excused by the absence of a "helper". The wires were not
something which appeared suddenly, but, existed before he ever
began his task and could have been spotted by inspecting the
location. Nor is the Claimant any less culpable because he was
unfamiliar with the area. For this reason alone, he should have
been more thorough in his observations before starting his work.
The Claimant has a fairly good employment record and a
lengthy tenure. However, the seriousness of the accident, which
could have resulted in fatalities, along with the fact the
accident could very easily have been prevented by the normal
execution of his job, justifies the penalty issued in this case.
The Claimant was afforded a complete and fair hearing.
AWARD
The claim is denied.
Carol J. amperini, Neutral
Submitted:
September 30, 19$8
Denver, Colorado
3