BEFORE SPECIAL BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 986
Case No. 313
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
The Carrier's discipline (dismissal in all capacities) of Mr. S. Hahn, issued by letter dated August 28, 2014, in connection with his alleged failure to comply with the Carrier's attendance-related policies was arbitrary, capricious and unreasonable (System File D01001614-2/BMWE-581D NRP).
As a consequence of the Carrier's violation referred to in Part 1 above, Mr. S. Hahn shall have his record cleared of the charges and results therefrom, be compensated for any lost work opportunity or benefits resulting from the Carrier's actions and be immediately reinstated to the Carrier's service, with all rights and benefits associated therewith."
FINDINGS:
By notice dated August 13, 20141 the Claimant was directed to attend a formal investigation on charges that the Claimant had violated the Carrier's National System Attendance Policy and pertinent sections of the Carrier's Standards of Excellence based on a record of excessive absenteeism. The investigation was conducted, as scheduled, on August 21, 2014. By letter dated August 28, 2014, the Claimant was notified that he had been found guilty as charged and that he was being dismissed from the Carrier's service. The Organization thereafter filed a claim on the Claimant's behalf, challenging the Carrier's decision to discipline him. The Carrier denied the claim.
The Carrier contends that the instant claim should be denied in its entirety because
the Organization's appeal was untimely anq the claim therefore is time-barred, because substantial evidence in the record supports the finding that the Claimant was guilty as charged, and because of the Claimant's record of prior discipline for excessive absenteeism including a suspension and signed waiver agreement just months before the instant charges were issued. The Organization contends that the instant claim should be sustained in its entirety because the Carrier failed to meet its burden of proof, because the Claimant was accused of absences without permission on dates he was off with Carrier approval due to medical reasons, because the Claimant never received timely warning that his medically-related absences were being held against him, and because the Carrier was well aware of the Claimant's severe and debilitating medical problems.
The parties being unable to resolve their dispute, this matter came before this
Board.
There is no need to address the procedural arguments.
This Board has reviewed the evidence and testimony in this case, and we find that there is sufficient evidence in the record to support the finding that the Claimant was guilty of excessive absenteeism in violation of the Carrier's rules. The record reveals that the Claimant failed to protect his assignment on July 29, 30, and 31, 2014. Moreover, the Claimant had accumulated a terrible record of attendance over the past twelve months in which he was absent fifteen days. Given that record, the Claimant brought himself to further disciplinary action.
Once this Board has determined that there is sufficient evidence in the record to ' support the guilty finding, we next tum our attention to the type of discipline imposed.
This Board will not set aside a Carrier's imposition of discipline unless we find its actions to have been unreasonable, arbitrary, or capricious.
The Claimant's disciplinary record contains a reprimand, a five-day suspension, a
fifteen-day suspension, and a previous termination for excessive absenteeism. Given that poor background, this Board cannot find that the Carrier acted unreasonably, arbitrarily, or capriciously when it terminated the Claimant in this case. Therefore, the claim must be denied.
AWARD:
The claim is denied.
b<Z
DATED: 3-e Ql.:<--w-- ( \ 0 \ c l-tlb G-l-:o.; ..J\